2026 released paper · 4052/02 · 23 October 2026
Paper 2: what was tested
A question-by-question review, topic heatmaps and an honest comparison with our pre-exam priorities and specimen papers.
Largest primary categories
Equations & inequalities 11; the integrated real-world problem 10; vectors 8; graphs, sequences and trigonometry 7 each.
Unexpected emphasis
Construction returned for 2 marks. Sequences took 7, and congruence/angle proof occupied Q5(b). The revised specimen underrepresented these.
Predicted skills that did appear
Matrix multiplication and interpretation; fractional-to-quadratic solving; sine area and non-right-angle rules; vector ratios and collinearity; a final modelling decision.
Predicted skills that did not
No cumulative-frequency curve or numerical SD; no extended coordinate geometry; no 3D trigonometry; no curve tangent or curve–line solving; no circle/radian segment task.
Question map
| Question | Marks | Content tested | Primary-topic split | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 7 | Two function graphs | Functions & graphs 7 | Printed pp. 4–5 |
| Q2 | 11 | Numbers, estimation and sequences | Numbers & indices 4; Sequences & patterns 7 | Printed pp. 6–7 |
| Q3 | 14 | Algebra, indices and equations | Equations & inequalities 7; Numbers & indices 2; Algebra & formulae 5 | Printed pp. 8–9 |
| Q4 | 11 | A prism, filling rate and circular scaling | Mensuration 5; Ratio, proportion & scales 3; Congruence & similarity 3 | Printed pp. 10–11 |
| Q5 | 7 | Construction and geometric proof | Construction 2; Congruence & similarity 3; Angles & polygons 2 | Printed pp. 12–13 |
| Q6 | 11 | Festival statistics, matrices and probability | Statistics 6; Matrices 3; Probability 2 | Printed pp. 14–15 |
| Q7 | 11 | A quadratic inside a trigonometry problem | Pythagoras, trig & bearings 7; Equations & inequalities 4 | Printed pp. 16–17 |
| Q8 | 8 | Column vectors and vector proof | Vectors 8 | Printed pp. 18–19 |
| Q9 | 10 | Population planning and compound interest | Integrated real-world problem 10 | Printed pp. 20–21 |
P2 topic heatmap
| Topic | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Q5 | Q6 | Q7 | Q8 | Q9 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equations & inequalities | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 11 |
| Integrated real-world problem | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
| Vectors | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Functions & graphs | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| Sequences & patterns | 0 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| Pythagoras, trig & bearings | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| Numbers & indices | 0 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| Congruence & similarity | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| Statistics | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| Algebra & formulae | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Mensuration | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Matrices | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Ratio, proportion & scales | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Construction | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Angles & polygons | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Probability | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Circle properties | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Coordinate geometry | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Financial arithmetic | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Percentages | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sets | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Rates, speed & travel graphs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| All topics | 7 | 11 | 14 | 11 | 7 | 11 | 11 | 8 | 10 | 90 |
Each number is an allocated mark, not a probability. One primary topic per subpart; darker cells mean more marks. The total row always covers the full paper even when topic rows are filtered.
Recent P2 comparison
| Topic | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equations & inequalities | 8 | 12 | 10 | 11 |
| Numbers & indices | 1 | 4 | 3 | 6 |
| Algebra & formulae | 4 | 4 | 5 | 5 |
| Statistics | 4 | 5 | 5 | 6 |
| Mensuration | 13 | 7 | 6 | 5 |
| Pythagoras, trig & bearings | 0 | 9 | 11 | 7 |
| Congruence & similarity | 0 | 3 | 2 | 6 |
| Functions & graphs | 11 | 11 | 7 | 7 |
| Integrated real-world problem | 10 | 11 | 9 | 10 |
| Ratio, proportion & scales | 3 | 2 | 6 | 3 |
| Vectors | 4 | 0 | 0 | 8 |
| Sequences & patterns | 10 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| Probability | 5 | 4 | 6 | 2 |
| Coordinate geometry | 7 | 9 | 6 | 0 |
| Circle properties | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Rates, speed & travel graphs | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Financial arithmetic | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Matrices | 0 | 5 | 3 | 3 |
| Sets | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 |
| Construction | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Angles & polygons | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2 |
| Percentages | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| Total | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 |
Comparable 4052 papers only: each is out of 90. The older 4048 paper also labelled 2023 is excluded. Historical classifications are the previously audited ledger; 2026 is classified from the supplied scan.
Recurring areas
Equations: 8 → 12 → 10 → 11 marks. Vectors: 4 → 0 → 0 → 8. Matrices: 0 → 5 → 3 → 3. The final real-world task remains prominent at 10, 11, 9, 10.
A trend can break
Coordinates had 7, 9, 6 primary marks in 2023–2025, then 0 in 2026. Sequences moved 10 → 0 → 0 → 7; construction moved 0 → 0 → 0 → 2.
How the earlier predictions held up
| Earlier tier | Priority | Actual reference | Assessment | What matched / differed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| First | Graphs | Q1: 7 marks | Partial method match | Table and curve plotting appeared, plus quadratic sketching. No tangent gradient or curve–line equation-solving task. |
| First | Quadratics / fractional equations | Q3(c); Q7(a)–(c) | Strong method match | A fractional equation genuinely led to a quadratic; the triangle question required forming an equation, factorising and rejecting a root. The revised specimen used a photo-border context and the formula, so its exact setting did not match. |
| First | Matrices | Q6(b): 3 marks | Strong method match | Quantities × unit values and interpretation appeared. Actual task used profit via P(D − C), rather than ticket revenue. |
| First | Non-right-angled trigonometry | Q7(a),(d): 7 primary marks | Strong method match | ½ab sin C, cosine rule and sine rule/obtuse angle appeared. No 3D angle or elevation problem. |
| First | Real-world problem | Q9: 10 marks | Broad structure match | Final multi-step modelling, graph use and justified decision appeared. The population, infrastructure and compound-interest context was not predicted by the revised coach problem. |
| Next | Coordinate geometry | No dedicated coordinate-geometry question | Miss | No line equation, intersection or coordinate area. Q8(a) used position vectors and a magnitude: this overlaps distance skills but is classified as vectors, not a successful extended-coordinate prediction. |
| Next | Vectors | Q8: 8 marks | Strong method match | Vector routes, ratios and a scalar-multiple collinearity proof appeared. No vector area-ratio question. |
| Next | Cumulative frequency / numerical SD | Q6(a) used different statistics | Miss at concept level | Statistics appeared, but as a pie chart and weighted mean. No CF graph, quartile reading or numerical SD calculation. |
| Next | Composite solids / scaling | Q4: 11 mixed-topic marks | Partial method match | Composite cross-section volume, filling rate and radius/area scaling appeared. No hemisphere composite surface or cubed similar-solid scale factor; the actual cylinders had equal heights and were not similar. |
| Short drill | Sequences | Q2(d): 7 marks | Underweighted | Arithmetic and geometric sequences plus a divisibility explanation appeared. The original P2 had a sequence question; the revised P2 omitted it. |
| Short drill | Construction / angles | Q5(a),(b)(ii): 4 primary marks | Underweighted | An accurate protractor construction and an angle proof appeared. The low historical P2 construction frequency did not rule this out. |
| Maintain | Probability / proof / algebra | Q3; Q5(b); Q6(c) | Mixed | Congruence, algebra and repeated independent-event probability mattered. No circle theorem, tree diagram, radians or segment-area question. |
Revised P2 specimen: question-by-question audit
The ten-question specimen written after P1 is assessed as it stood before this P2 was supplied. A transferable method is distinguished from a matching question structure.
| Specimen Q | Prepared content | Actual P2 | Match level | Evidence / limitation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Matrices and percentages | Q6(b) | Close core method | Matrix product and meaning of entries; actual adds subtraction for profit. The ticket-price percentage extension did not recur. |
| 2 | CF and numerical SD | Q6(a) | Broad topic only | Actual statistics is pie chart + weighted mean. CF, SD calculation and misleading bar chart were absent. |
| 3 | Coordinate trapezium | None | No dedicated match | No extended line, intersection, ratio or area task. Position-vector magnitude is too narrow to count this question as a hit. |
| 4 | Field / mast trigonometry | Q7(a),(d) | Partial method match | Sine area and cosine rule transferable; actual mixes algebra, a quadratic and an obtuse-angle sine-rule choice. No 3D mast. |
| 5 | Curve and straight lines | Q1(a) | Partial method match | Table and curve plotting transfer, but actual function has two branches separated by x = 0. No tangent or suitable straight line. |
| 6 | Vectors and areas | Q8(b) | Close core method | Vector routes, section ratios and scalar multiples transfer. Actual asks collinearity and a ratio; no area ratio. |
| 7 | Photo-border quadratic | Q3(c); Q7(a)–(c) | Partial method match | Quadratic solving and rejecting a root transfer. The actual formation is trigonometric, and factorisation is explicitly required in Q7(b). |
| 8 | Circle proof and probability | Q5(b); Q6(c) | Broad methods only | Congruence and probability transfer, but no circle, radians, tree or conditional-sample-space task. |
| 9 | Composite vessel / similar solids | Q4 | Partial method match | Volume and scaling principles transfer. Actual uses a prism, a filling rate and equal-height cylinders rather than similar solids. |
| 10 | Coach decision | Q9 | Structure only | Final multi-step decision transfers. Population extrapolation and compound interest were omitted from the revised specimen. |
What to learn from the misses
- Keep a short drill for every syllabus strand. Low historical frequency did not eliminate construction.
- Practise statistics as a family: pie charts, weighted means, CF, spread and interpretation are different skills.
- For quadratics, retain factorisation, the formula and contextual checks. Actual Q7(b) explicitly demanded factorisation.
- For scaling, check what is fixed. Equal-height cylinders require direct formula ratios, not similar-solid rules.
- For real-world tasks, practise percentages, capacity, rounding and compound interest together with graph reading.