Download PDFTopic ledger (CSV)

2026 released paper · 4052/02 · 23 October 2026

Paper 2: what was tested

A question-by-question review, topic heatmaps and an honest comparison with our pre-exam priorities and specimen papers.

90marks across 9 questions
14marks in Q3: algebra & equations
8vector marks after 1 in P1
7sequence marks; none in P1
The main lesson: P2 brought back several P1 gaps, but it also repeated algebra, graphs, statistics, probability and trigonometry. An untested P1 topic was a revision signal, not a promise that it would appear in P2.

Largest primary categories

Equations & inequalities 11; the integrated real-world problem 10; vectors 8; graphs, sequences and trigonometry 7 each.

Unexpected emphasis

Construction returned for 2 marks. Sequences took 7, and congruence/angle proof occupied Q5(b). The revised specimen underrepresented these.

Predicted skills that did appear

Matrix multiplication and interpretation; fractional-to-quadratic solving; sine area and non-right-angle rules; vector ratios and collinearity; a final modelling decision.

Predicted skills that did not

No cumulative-frequency curve or numerical SD; no extended coordinate geometry; no 3D trigonometry; no curve tangent or curve–line solving; no circle/radian segment task.

Question map

QuestionMarksContent testedPrimary-topic splitSource
Q17Two function graphsFunctions & graphs 7Printed pp. 4–5
Q211Numbers, estimation and sequencesNumbers & indices 4; Sequences & patterns 7Printed pp. 6–7
Q314Algebra, indices and equationsEquations & inequalities 7; Numbers & indices 2; Algebra & formulae 5Printed pp. 8–9
Q411A prism, filling rate and circular scalingMensuration 5; Ratio, proportion & scales 3; Congruence & similarity 3Printed pp. 10–11
Q57Construction and geometric proofConstruction 2; Congruence & similarity 3; Angles & polygons 2Printed pp. 12–13
Q611Festival statistics, matrices and probabilityStatistics 6; Matrices 3; Probability 2Printed pp. 14–15
Q711A quadratic inside a trigonometry problemPythagoras, trig & bearings 7; Equations & inequalities 4Printed pp. 16–17
Q88Column vectors and vector proofVectors 8Printed pp. 18–19
Q910Population planning and compound interestIntegrated real-world problem 10Printed pp. 20–21

P2 topic heatmap

2026 P2: primary-topic marks by question
TopicQ1Q2Q3Q4Q5Q6Q7Q8Q9Total
Equations & inequalities00700040011
Integrated real-world problem000000001010
Vectors0000000808
Functions & graphs7000000007
Sequences & patterns0700000007
Pythagoras, trig & bearings0000007007
Numbers & indices0420000006
Congruence & similarity0003300006
Statistics0000060006
Algebra & formulae0050000005
Mensuration0005000005
Matrices0000030003
Ratio, proportion & scales0003000003
Construction0000200002
Angles & polygons0000200002
Probability0000020002
Circle properties0000000000
Coordinate geometry0000000000
Financial arithmetic0000000000
Percentages0000000000
Sets0000000000
Rates, speed & travel graphs0000000000
All topics71114117111181090

Each number is an allocated mark, not a probability. One primary topic per subpart; darker cells mean more marks. The total row always covers the full paper even when topic rows are filtered.

Counting rule: Q9 stays together as a 10-mark integrated real-world problem. Compound interest, percentages and graph extrapolation are embedded within it. Q4(b)(i) is under similarity/scaling, with percentage changes embedded; Q8(a)(ii) is under vectors, with Pythagoras/distance embedded. Zero primary marks does not mean a skill was unused.

Recent P2 comparison

Paper 2: marks in the 4052 series
Topic2023202420252026
Equations & inequalities8121011
Numbers & indices1436
Algebra & formulae4455
Statistics4556
Mensuration13765
Pythagoras, trig & bearings09117
Congruence & similarity0326
Functions & graphs111177
Integrated real-world problem1011910
Ratio, proportion & scales3263
Vectors4008
Sequences & patterns10007
Probability5462
Coordinate geometry7960
Circle properties4000
Rates, speed & travel graphs2200
Financial arithmetic0000
Matrices0533
Sets0040
Construction0002
Angles & polygons0062
Percentages4210
Total90909090

Comparable 4052 papers only: each is out of 90. The older 4048 paper also labelled 2023 is excluded. Historical classifications are the previously audited ledger; 2026 is classified from the supplied scan.

Recurring areas

Equations: 8 → 12 → 10 → 11 marks. Vectors: 4 → 0 → 0 → 8. Matrices: 0 → 5 → 3 → 3. The final real-world task remains prominent at 10, 11, 9, 10.

A trend can break

Coordinates had 7, 9, 6 primary marks in 2023–2025, then 0 in 2026. Sequences moved 10 → 0 → 0 → 7; construction moved 0 → 0 → 0 → 2.

How the earlier predictions held up

All five “First” priority areas appeared at broad topic level. Their exact methods and settings did not all match. In particular, “graphs appeared” does not mean the predicted tangent or graphical equation question appeared. No single “accuracy percentage” is claimed.
Earlier tierPriorityActual referenceAssessmentWhat matched / differed
FirstGraphsQ1: 7 marksPartial method matchTable and curve plotting appeared, plus quadratic sketching. No tangent gradient or curve–line equation-solving task.
FirstQuadratics / fractional equationsQ3(c); Q7(a)–(c)Strong method matchA fractional equation genuinely led to a quadratic; the triangle question required forming an equation, factorising and rejecting a root. The revised specimen used a photo-border context and the formula, so its exact setting did not match.
FirstMatricesQ6(b): 3 marksStrong method matchQuantities × unit values and interpretation appeared. Actual task used profit via P(D − C), rather than ticket revenue.
FirstNon-right-angled trigonometryQ7(a),(d): 7 primary marksStrong method match½ab sin C, cosine rule and sine rule/obtuse angle appeared. No 3D angle or elevation problem.
FirstReal-world problemQ9: 10 marksBroad structure matchFinal multi-step modelling, graph use and justified decision appeared. The population, infrastructure and compound-interest context was not predicted by the revised coach problem.
NextCoordinate geometryNo dedicated coordinate-geometry questionMissNo line equation, intersection or coordinate area. Q8(a) used position vectors and a magnitude: this overlaps distance skills but is classified as vectors, not a successful extended-coordinate prediction.
NextVectorsQ8: 8 marksStrong method matchVector routes, ratios and a scalar-multiple collinearity proof appeared. No vector area-ratio question.
NextCumulative frequency / numerical SDQ6(a) used different statisticsMiss at concept levelStatistics appeared, but as a pie chart and weighted mean. No CF graph, quartile reading or numerical SD calculation.
NextComposite solids / scalingQ4: 11 mixed-topic marksPartial method matchComposite cross-section volume, filling rate and radius/area scaling appeared. No hemisphere composite surface or cubed similar-solid scale factor; the actual cylinders had equal heights and were not similar.
Short drillSequencesQ2(d): 7 marksUnderweightedArithmetic and geometric sequences plus a divisibility explanation appeared. The original P2 had a sequence question; the revised P2 omitted it.
Short drillConstruction / anglesQ5(a),(b)(ii): 4 primary marksUnderweightedAn accurate protractor construction and an angle proof appeared. The low historical P2 construction frequency did not rule this out.
MaintainProbability / proof / algebraQ3; Q5(b); Q6(c)MixedCongruence, algebra and repeated independent-event probability mattered. No circle theorem, tree diagram, radians or segment-area question.

Revised P2 specimen: question-by-question audit

The ten-question specimen written after P1 is assessed as it stood before this P2 was supplied. A transferable method is distinguished from a matching question structure.

Specimen QPrepared contentActual P2Match levelEvidence / limitation
1Matrices and percentagesQ6(b)Close core methodMatrix product and meaning of entries; actual adds subtraction for profit. The ticket-price percentage extension did not recur.
2CF and numerical SDQ6(a)Broad topic onlyActual statistics is pie chart + weighted mean. CF, SD calculation and misleading bar chart were absent.
3Coordinate trapeziumNoneNo dedicated matchNo extended line, intersection, ratio or area task. Position-vector magnitude is too narrow to count this question as a hit.
4Field / mast trigonometryQ7(a),(d)Partial method matchSine area and cosine rule transferable; actual mixes algebra, a quadratic and an obtuse-angle sine-rule choice. No 3D mast.
5Curve and straight linesQ1(a)Partial method matchTable and curve plotting transfer, but actual function has two branches separated by x = 0. No tangent or suitable straight line.
6Vectors and areasQ8(b)Close core methodVector routes, section ratios and scalar multiples transfer. Actual asks collinearity and a ratio; no area ratio.
7Photo-border quadraticQ3(c); Q7(a)–(c)Partial method matchQuadratic solving and rejecting a root transfer. The actual formation is trigonometric, and factorisation is explicitly required in Q7(b).
8Circle proof and probabilityQ5(b); Q6(c)Broad methods onlyCongruence and probability transfer, but no circle, radians, tree or conditional-sample-space task.
9Composite vessel / similar solidsQ4Partial method matchVolume and scaling principles transfer. Actual uses a prism, a filling rate and equal-height cylinders rather than similar solids.
10Coach decisionQ9Structure onlyFinal multi-step decision transfers. Population extrapolation and compound interest were omitted from the revised specimen.
The original specimen also matters. Its Q8 included sequence work and an algebraic proof, so it offered preparation the revised specimen removed. Original Q1(b) covered changing the subject, relevant to actual Q3(d). Its sequence was quadratic rather than the actual arithmetic/geometric combination. Original Q2’s grouped statistics also missed the actual pie-chart and weighted-mean structure. Neither specimen predicted Q9’s population/compound-interest setting.

What to learn from the misses