📐 Congruence & Similarity — Revision Notes

Two shapes are congruent when one is a copy of the other, and similar when one is a photocopy at another zoom. One scale factor k runs it: lengths × k, areas × k², volumes × k³. Syllabus outcomes G2 2.6, 2.7, 2.8, 2.9 and 2.10.Syllabus outcomes G2 2.4, 2.5, 2.6 and 2.7.

The chapter in one table

Not on the formula sheet Cone and sphere are printed Name the reason, show the ratio

The questionWhere it is answeredThe tool
Where is the point equidistant from two others, or from two lines? 7.1 Bisectors the perpendicular bisector and the angle bisector
A drawing says 1 : 25 000. How far is that really? 7.1 Scale drawings multiply by the scale — after making both units the same
Are these two triangles exactly the same? ✕ Not in G2 7.2 Congruence tests SSS, SAS, AAS or RHS — and never SSA
Are these two triangles the same shape? ✕ Not in G2 7.3 Similarity tests AA, SSS or SAS Similarity Test
One length is missing, and the triangles are similar. 7.3 Finding a length one equation of matching ratios
The lengths are in the ratio 2 : 3. What about the areas? ✕ Not in G2 7.4 Area ratio k² — here 4 : 9
… and the volumes, or the masses? ✕ Not in G2 7.5 Volume ratio k³ — here 8 : 27
I am given an area or a volume ratio and want a length. ✕ Not in G2 7.5 Working backwards square root for an area, cube root for a volume
More detail

K310 prints a MATHEMATICAL FORMULAE page at the front of each paper, holding compound interest, mensuration, ½ab sin C, arc length and sector area in radians, the sine and cosine rules, mean and standard deviation — and not one line of this chapter. The congruence and similarity tests are not there, and neither are the area and volume ratios. All of it is carried in your head.

The sheet does help once a similar-solids question asks for an actual volume rather than a ratio: the printed page holds volume of a cone = ⅓πr²h, volume of a sphere = 43πr³, curved surface area of a cone = πrl and surface area of a sphere = 4πr². What it does not hold is k² or k³. See 7.5 Cutting a cone, where both halves of that are needed.

Two rules from the front of the paper, quoted: "Omission of essential working will result in loss of marks." and "Give non-exact numerical answers correct to 3 significant figures, or 1 decimal place in the case of angles in degrees, unless a different level of accuracy is specified in the question." Here the "essential working" is nearly always the same two lines: the ratio you wrote down, and the reason you were allowed to write it. A congruence or similarity statement carries the test named after it, and a k³ carries a sentence saying which solid is which.

The perpendicular bisector of a line segment

Cut a line segment in half, at right angles, and you get a line with a surprising property: every point on it is the same distance from the two ends. That is the whole reason the perpendicular bisector is on the syllabus — it is the answer to "where are all the points equidistant from A and B?"

The perpendicular bisector of a line segment AB is the line that cuts AB in half and is perpendicular to it. If XY is the perpendicular bisector of AB, then
  • XYAB;
  • XY passes through the midpoint M of AB, so AM = MB;
  • any point P on XY is equidistant from the two endpoints, i.e. PA = PB;
  • PAM ≡ △PBM.
A B M P X Y the perpendicular bisector of AB
Fig. 7.1
The construction, and the property in one picture. Open the compasses to more than half of AB and draw an arc from A and an arc from B, above and below; the arcs cross at X and Y, and the line XY is the perpendicular bisector. Every point P on it satisfies PA = PB, because △PAM and △PBM are congruent.
Open the compasses to more than half of AB, or the two arcs do not cross and there is nothing to join. Leave the arcs on the page: they are the marked evidence of the construction.

Walkthrough 1 — constructing the perpendicular bisector Basic

The line segment AB, of length 7.4 cm, is drawn below. Using a pair of compasses and a straight edge only, construct the perpendicular bisector of AB. Mark the point where it crosses AB as M, and state the length of AM.
A B AB = 7.4 cm centre A, radius 5 cm X Y same radius, centre B M 3.7 cm 3.7 cm the perpendicular bisector of AB
Fig. 7.2
Step the walkthrough and the construction is drawn one compass act at a time; nothing is rubbed out afterwards. All four arcs are struck with the same radius, 5 cm, so X and Y are each 5 cm from A and 5 cm from B; the line ruled through them is the perpendicular bisector, cutting AB at right angles at its midpoint M.
  1. Open the compasses to 5 cm — more than half of 7.4 cm — and, with the point on A, draw an arc above AB and an arc below it.
    Half of AB is 3.7 cm, so the radius has to beat 3.7 cm or the arcs struck from the two ends do not meet. 5 cm also brings them across each other at close to a right angle, which is easy to read.
  2. Without changing the radius, put the point on B and draw two more arcs, cutting the first two at X and at Y.
    Keeping the radius fixed is what makes X exactly as far from A as from B, and the same for Y. Re-setting the compasses between the two centres loses that, and the line then misses the midpoint.
  3. Rule the line through X and Y. It crosses AB at M.
    Both X and Y are equidistant from A and B, so both lie on the perpendicular bisector — and two points fix a line. Lay the straight edge along the two crossings themselves.
  4. AM = MB = 3.7 cm, and ∠AMX = 90°.
    That is what the construction has produced, and it is the check worth making: half of 7.4 cm is 3.7 cm, and a set square laid along AB sits flush against XY.
  5. XY is the perpendicular bisector of AB, and AM = 3.7 cm.
    The question wanted the construction and a length, so give both. Leave the arcs on the page: they are the evidence that the line was constructed rather than measured, and the method mark sits on them.

Walkthrough 2 — using the perpendicular-bisector property Basic

The point P lies on the perpendicular bisector of the line segment AB. Given that PA = 5x − 3 and PB = 2x + 9, find the value of x and the length of PA.
  1. PA = PB  (P lies on the perpendicular bisector of AB)
    This is the property doing all the work. Write the reason in brackets after PA = PB; the reason is what the mark is for.
  2. 5x − 3 = 2x + 9
    Substitute the two given expressions into that equation. Nothing here is about geometry any more — it is a linear equation in one variable.
  3. 3x = 12
    Take 2x from both sides and add 3 to both sides. Collecting the x terms on the side where the coefficient is bigger keeps the number in front of x positive.
  4. x = 4
    Divide both sides by 3. The question asked for x first, so this is already half the answer — but only half.
  5. PA = 5(4) − 3 = 17
    Substitute back into the expression the question gave for PA. Check it against the other one: PB = 2(4) + 9 = 17 as well, which is exactly what "equidistant" promised, and is a free verification.
More detail

Why the property holds: M is the midpoint, so AM = MB; PM is shared; and ∠PMA = ∠PMB = 90°. That is two sides and the angle between them, so △PAM ≡ △PBM and the matching sides PA and PB are equal. It works for every P on XY, which is why the line is the answer to "where are the points equidistant from A and B?"

On the radius: any opening greater than half of AB works, and 5 cm for a 7.4 cm segment is a comfortable choice because it brings the arcs across each other at close to a right angle — a nearly square crossing is one a pencil point can be put on exactly. A radius that is re-set between the two centres gives a point that is no longer equally far from both ends, and the ruled line then misses the midpoint.

Real papers print the instruction not to rub out the construction arcs, and the reason is that the arcs are the only record of how the line was found. If the finished drawing measures wrong — AM is not half of AB, or the set square does not sit flush — an earlier compass act is the place to look.

The angle bisector

The perpendicular bisector answers "equidistant from two points". The angle bisector answers the other question: "equidistant from two lines".

The angle bisector of ∠BAC is the line through A that cuts the angle into two equal halves. If AX is the angle bisector of ∠BAC, then
  • BAX = ∠CAX;
  • any point P on the angle bisector AX is equidistant from the two sides BA and CA.
A B C D E F P X
Fig. 7.3
An arc centred on A cuts the two arms at D and E; equal arcs from D and from E cross at F; the ray AF is the bisector. The distance from a point to a line always means the perpendicular distance — that is why the two dashed lines from P meet the arms at right angles.
"Distance from a line" means the perpendicular distance. "P is 4 cm from AB" gives the length of the perpendicular from P to AB. Draw that perpendicular in and mark the right angle.

Walkthrough 3 — constructing the bisector of an angle Basic

The diagram below shows PQR = 74°. Using a pair of compasses and a straight edge only, construct the bisector of ∠PQR, and state the size of each of the two angles it makes.
Q R P 74° S T centre Q, radius 4.5 cm centre S, radius 3.5 cm U same radius, centre T 37° 37° the bisector of ∠PQR
Fig. 7.4
Step the walkthrough and the construction is drawn one compass act at a time; every arc stays on the finished diagram. The first arc gives QS = QT = 4.5 cm and the second pair gives SU = TU = 3.5 cm, so the ray from Q through U splits the 74° angle into two equal halves of 37°.
  1. With the point on Q and any convenient radius — 4.5 cm here — draw an arc cutting QP at S and QR at T.
    This radius really is free; it only has to be short enough that the arc cuts both arms. What it buys is QS = QT, and that equality is what will make the two halves of the angle come out the same size.
  2. Open the compasses to 3.5 cm — more than half of ST — and, with the point on S, draw an arc inside the angle.
    ST measures about 5.4 cm here, so half of it is under 2.8 cm. A radius bigger than that meets the matching arc struck from T — the "more than half" rule again, now applied to ST.
  3. Keeping the same radius, put the point on T and draw an arc cutting the last one at U.
    Same radius again, so SU = TU = 3.5 cm. U is now exactly as far from the mark on one arm as from the mark on the other, which is what puts it on the bisector rather than beside it.
  4. Rule the line from Q through U. Then ∠PQU = ∠RQU = 37°.
    QS = QT, SU = TU, and QU is shared, so the two halves of the picture are mirror images of each other and the two angles at Q must be equal. 74° ÷ 2 = 37° is then the protractor check.
  5. QU produced is the bisector of ∠PQR, and each half is 37°.
    Both halves of the question are answered: the line, and its size. Leave all three arcs on the paper — they are what shows the bisector was constructed rather than measured off with a protractor.
More detail

"P is 4 cm from AB" never means the length of some slanting line from P to the arm: the distance from a point to a line is the perpendicular distance, which is why the two dashed lines in the figure meet the arms at right angles. Once that perpendicular is drawn in and its right angle marked, the rest of the question is usually ordinary geometry.

The first radius in the construction is genuinely free — it only has to be short enough for the arc to cut both arms. What it buys is QS = QT. The second radius has to beat half of ST for the same reason the perpendicular bisector needs more than half of AB: below that the two arcs never cross. With QS = QT, SU = TU and QU shared, the two halves of the picture are mirror images (SSS), so the two angles at Q are equal.

Which bisector does the question want?

Nearly every exam use of these two constructions is one of the four rows below. Read the question for the words in the left-hand column.

The question says…ConstructBecause
"equidistant from A and B", "the same distance from the two towns" the perpendicular bisector of AB every point on it satisfies PA = PB
"equidistant from the two roads", "the same distance from AB and AC" the angle bisector of the angle between them every point on it is the same perpendicular distance from both arms
"equidistant from three towns A, B and C" two perpendicular bisectors — of AB and of BC — and take where they cross the first gives PA = PB, the second gives PB = PC; at the crossing all three are equal
"nearer to A than to B" the perpendicular bisector of AB, then shade A's side of it the bisector is the boundary; either side of it one distance beats the other

Past-paper questions

G3 N2017 · Paper 1 · Q10 3 marks

The diagram represents a plot of land, ABCD, which is to be used for a park.

BCAD
  1. Construct the perpendicular bisector of BC. [1]
  2. Construct the bisector of angle ADC. [1]
  3. A café is to be built in the park, nearer to C than to B and nearer to AD than to CD.
    Shade the region where the café is to be built. [1]
Worked solution
(a)(b)(c)BCAD

(a) Set the compasses to more than half of BC. With the point at B draw an arc on each side of BC, and without changing the setting repeat from C. Join the two crossing points: that line is the perpendicular bisector of BC, and every point on it satisfies PB = PC.

(b) With the point at D draw one arc cutting DA and DC. From those two cuts draw two arcs of equal radius that cross inside the angle, and join D to the crossing: that line is the bisector of angle ADC, and every point on it is the same perpendicular distance from DA as from DC.

(c) "Nearer to C than to B" is everything on C's side of the line from (a); "nearer to AD than to CD" is everything on A's side of the line from (b). The café goes in the overlap — the triangle bounded by the perpendicular bisector on the left, the angle bisector above and AD below, with D as its third corner (shaded green above).

Why this works. Three marks: two constructions and one region. The arcs are the marked evidence of each construction, so they stay on the page. For (c), "nearer to C than to B" is about two points — perpendicular bisector — while "nearer to AD than to CD" is about two lines, and the shading is the overlap of the two regions.

G3 N2019 · Paper 1 · Q12 3 marks

The diagram shows a quadrilateral ABCD.

ABCD

On the diagram,

  1. construct the bisector of angle ADC, [1]
  2. construct the perpendicular bisector of AB, [1]
  3. shade the region inside ABCD that is closer to DC than to DA and closer to A than to B. [1]
Worked solution
(a)(b)(c)ABCD

(a) With the compass point at D, draw an arc cutting DA and DC; from those two cuts draw two equal arcs that cross, and join D to the crossing. That is the bisector of angle ADC (pink above), and every point on it is the same perpendicular distance from DA as from DC.

(b) With the compasses set to more than half of AB, draw arcs from A and from B above and below AB and join the two crossings. That is the perpendicular bisector of AB (blue above), and every point on it satisfies PA = PB.

(c) "Closer to DC than to DA" is the DC side of the bisector in (a) — above it. "Closer to A than to B" is the A side of the bisector in (b) — to its left. The region asked for is the overlap: the triangle with corners at D, where the vertical bisector cuts DC, and where the two constructed lines cross.

Why this works. The same three marks as N2017/P1/Q10 with the two constructions swapped, so what is tested is reading points (perpendicular bisector) apart from lines (angle bisector). Mark which side of each bisector you want before shading anything. The region wanted is inside ABCD, so the shading stops at DC.

Enlargement and reduction ⓘ Recap

A scale drawing is nothing more than an enlargement (or a reduction) of the real thing, so it is worth being clear about what "scale factor" does before the units get involved.

To enlarge a figure by a scale factor k, multiply every length by k. Every angle stays exactly the same. If k > 1 the figure gets bigger (an enlargement); if 0 < k < 1 it gets smaller (a reduction). The new figure and the old one are similar.
Angles do not scale. Doubling every length of a triangle leaves all three angles untouched, which is why a photocopy at 200% still looks like the same triangle, and why two equal angles are enough to prove similarity.

Scale drawings, and the 1 : n form

A map, a floor plan and an architect's elevation are all the same object: a drawing in which one length on the paper stands for a fixed multiple of itself in real life. The scale can be written two ways, and questions use both.

A scale may be given
  • in words — "1 cm represents 20 m"; or
  • as a ratio 1 : n — "1 : 2000", meaning 1 unit on the drawing stands for n of the same units in reality.
To turn one into the other, put both sides into the same unit first: 1 cm to 20 m is 1 cm to 2000 cm, i.e. 1 : 2000.
6 cm = 120 m actual 4.5 cm = 90 m actual 7.5 cm = 150 m actual P Q R 1 cm represents 20 m scale 1 : 2000
Fig. 7.5
A triangular plot drawn at 1 cm to 20 m, i.e. 1 : 2000. Every length on the drawing is the real length divided by 2000, and every angle is the real angle — which is why a scale drawing can be measured to answer a question the numbers do not give you directly. (Shown here at page size, not at true 6 cm.)
A ratio 1 : n has no units. Both sides are in the same unit, so convert before reading n. Keep three conversions ready: 1 m = 100 cm, 1 km = 1000 m = 100 000 cm.

Walkthrough 4 — both directions on a 1 : n map Basic

A map is drawn to a scale of 1 : 25 000. (i) Two towns are 14.4 cm apart on the map. Find the actual distance between them, in km. (ii) A straight canal is 9 km long. Find its length on the map, in cm.
  1. 1 cm on the map represents 25 000 cm in reality.
    Say the ratio out loud in one unit before doing anything else. "1 : 25 000" is unitless, so it is true of centimetres, metres or miles — choosing centimetres here matches the units the map lengths come in.
  2. Actual distance = 14.4 × 25 000 = 360 000 cm
    Going from the map to reality means the length grows, so multiply. The answer is still in centimetres at this point — the conversion is a separate step, and merging the two is where the zeros go missing.
  3. = 360 000 ÷ 100 000 = 3.6 km
    100 000 cm make 1 km (100 cm in a metre, 1000 m in a kilometre). The question named the unit it wanted, so the answer is not finished until it is in that unit.
  4. 9 km = 9 × 100 000 = 900 000 cm
    Part (ii) runs the other way, so convert the real length into the map's unit first. Dividing kilometres by 25 000 would give an answer in kilometres, which no map length ever is.
  5. Map length = 900 000 ÷ 25 000 = 36 cm
    Going from reality to the map means the length shrinks, so divide by the scale. Sanity-check the direction every time: a map distance must come out smaller than the real one.

Walkthrough 5 — finding the scale of a drawing, then using it Intermediate

On a scale drawing of a coastline, the towns A and B are 7.5 cm apart, and the actual distance AB is 45 km. (i) Find the scale of the drawing in the form 1 : n. (ii) A lighthouse L is 5.2 cm from A on the drawing. Find the actual distance AL, in km.
  1. 7.5 cm represents 45 km = 45 × 100 000 = 4 500 000 cm
    A ratio needs one unit on both sides, and the drawing is measured in centimetres, so the kilometres have to become centimetres before the ratio is written at all.
  2. Scale = 7.5 : 4 500 000
    Write it as a plain ratio first, in the order drawing : real. That order is what keeps every line after it the right way up.
  3. = 1 : 600 000  (dividing both sides by 7.5)
    The 1 : n form always comes from dividing both parts by the left-hand one. 4 500 000 ÷ 7.5 = 600 000.
  4. AL = 5.2 × 600 000 = 3 120 000 cm
    Now the scale is known, part (ii) is Walkthrough 4 again: drawing to reality, so multiply. Keep the working in centimetres until the last line.
  5. = 3 120 000 ÷ 100 000 = 31.2 km
    Convert once, at the end. A quick check: 5.2 cm is a bit under 7.5 cm, and 31.2 km is a bit under 45 km — the two lengths are in the same proportion, as they must be.
More detail

Almost everything that goes wrong in a scale question is a factor of 100 or 1000 rather than a wrong method, which is why the conversion deserves its own line of working. "1 : 25 000" is unitless, so it is equally true of centimetres, metres or miles; choosing the unit the drawing is measured in keeps the arithmetic small.

The direction is worth checking on every line. Drawing to reality makes the length bigger, so it multiplies; reality to drawing makes it smaller, so it divides. A map distance that comes out larger than the real one has been multiplied the wrong way, and the fastest fix is to reread the ratio in the order drawing : real.

A scale written n : 1 rather than 1 : n says the drawing is the bigger of the two — a microscope drawing rather than a map. The arithmetic is the same; only the direction swaps.

Past-paper questions

G3 N2023 · Paper 2 · Q1(c) 3 marks

The diameter of a red blood cell is 7.8×10−6 m.
In a scale drawing, the diameter of a red blood cell is 3.9 cm.

  1. Find the scale used for the drawing.
    Give your answer in the form n : 1. [2]
  2. Drawn to the same scale as the red blood cell, the diameter of a blood platelet is 8 mm.
    Find the actual diameter of the blood platelet.
    Give your answer in millimetres in standard form. [1]
Worked solution

(a) Put both lengths in the same unit first. In centimetres, 7.8×10−6 m =7.8×10−6×100=7.8×10−4 cm.

drawing : actual = 3.9 : 7.8×10−4

Divide both parts by 7.8×10−4: 3.97.8×10−4=0.5×104=5000, so the scale is 5000 : 1.

(b) The drawing is 5000 times the real thing, so divide by 5000:

actual diameter =85000=0.0016 mm = 1.6×10−3 mm

Why this works. A scale question is one ratio written twice, and the marks sit on the conversion: the cell is given in metres and the drawing in centimetres. A microscope drawing is n : 1 because the drawing is the bigger one, so 5000 enlarges here. The check on (b) is that a platelet comes out smaller than the 8 mm on the paper, so 5000 divides.

Area on a plan ⓘ Recap

If every length is multiplied by 2000, the area is multiplied not by 2000 but by 2000². A plan is an enlargement, and an enlargement scales area by the square of the scale factor.

For a scale of 1 : n,
  • a length on the drawing × n = the real length;
  • an area on the drawing × n² = the real area.
Remember the unit conversions square too: 1 m² = 100² = 10 000 cm² and 1 km² = 100 000² = 10 000 000 000 cm².

Walkthrough 6 — the real area from a plan Intermediate

A rectangular garden is drawn on a plan of scale 1 : 400. On the plan the garden measures 6 cm by 4.5 cm. Find the actual area of the garden, in m².
  1. Actual length = 6 × 400 = 2400 cm = 24 m
    The safest route is always to scale the two lengths first and only then multiply. Convert to metres straight away, because the answer is wanted in m².
  2. Actual width = 4.5 × 400 = 1800 cm = 18 m
    Both dimensions are scaled by the same factor — that is what "similar" means. A plan that stretched one direction more than the other would not be a scale drawing at all.
  3. Area = 24 × 18 = 432 m²
    Area of a rectangle = length × width, using the real lengths. Units: metres times metres gives m², which is what was asked for.
  4. Check, the fast way. Area on the plan = 6 × 4.5 = 27 cm²
    The alternative route is to scale the area itself. Work out the plan's area first — this is a genuine area, but of the drawing, not of the garden.
  5. 27 × 400² = 27 × 160 000 = 4 320 000 cm² = 4 320 000 ÷ 10 000 = 432 m²
    Areas scale by n², not n: multiplying by 400 once gives 10 800 cm², which is 400 times too small. The two routes agree, and that agreement is the check.
More detail

The last line carries a second squared conversion, and it is the one most often halved: 1 m² is 10 000 cm², not 100, because both the length and the width are converted. The same doubling-up gives 1 km² = 10 000 000 000 cm².

This is the same fact that runs the whole of 7.4, met a year early on a map: an area ratio is the square of a length ratio, whatever the two figures are.

Check yourself

  • The point P lies on the perpendicular bisector of MN, and PM = 3y + 2, PN = 5y − 8. Find y and PM.
    Answer

    PM = PN (P is on the perpendicular bisector of MN), so 3y + 2 = 5y − 8, giving 2y = 10 and y = 5. Then PM = 3(5) + 2 = 17 (and PN = 5(5) − 8 = 17, as a check).

  • AX is the angle bisector of ∠BAC, and ∠BAC = 78°. The point Q lies on AX and its distance from AB is 4.6 cm. Write down ∠BAX and the distance from Q to AC.
    Answer

    BAX = 78° ÷ 2 = 39°. Every point on the angle bisector is equidistant from the two arms, so the distance from Q to AC is also 4.6 cm — and both of those distances are measured perpendicular to the arm.

  • A map has a scale of 1 : 50 000. Two towns are 8.6 cm apart on the map. Find the actual distance between them, in km.
    Answer

    8.6 × 50 000 = 430 000 cm, and 430 000 ÷ 100 000 = 4.3 km.

  • On a plan of scale 1 : 250, a room measures 3.2 cm by 2.4 cm. Find the actual area of the room, in m².
    Answer

    3.2 × 250 = 800 cm = 8 m and 2.4 × 250 = 600 cm = 6 m, so the area is 8 × 6 = 48 m². (Or: 3.2 × 2.4 = 7.68 cm² on the plan, × 250² = 480 000 cm², ÷ 10 000 = 48 m².)

  • A scale drawing uses 1 cm to represent 8 m. Write the scale in the form 1 : n, and find the length on the drawing of a wall that is 68 m long.
    Answer

    8 m = 800 cm, so the scale is 1 : 800. The wall is 68 m = 6800 cm, so on the drawing it is 6800 ÷ 800 = 8.5 cm.

  • A pole is to be put up so that it is the same distance from each of three towns A, B and C. Explain, in one sentence, which constructions you would draw.
    Answer

    Construct the perpendicular bisector of AB (every point on it satisfies PA = PB) and the perpendicular bisector of BC (every point on it satisfies PB = PC); the pole goes where the two bisectors cross, because there PA = PB = PC.

Past-paper questions

G3 N2016 · Paper 1 · Q20 4 marks

A map of Western Europe has a scale of 1 : 2 500 000.

  1. The length of the river Rhine on the map is 49.3 cm.
    Calculate the actual length, in kilometres, of the river Rhine. [2]
  2. The area of Switzerland is 41 285 km².
    Calculate the area, in square centimetres, of Switzerland on the map. [2]
Worked solution

(a) 1 : 2 500 000 means 1 cm on the map is 2 500 000 cm on the ground.

actual length = 49.3 × 2 500 000 = 123 250 000 cm

1 km = 100 000 cm, so 123 250 000 ÷ 100 000 = 1232.5 km

(b) First put the scale in the units the question uses: 1 cm : 2 500 000 cm = 1 cm : 25 km.

Square both sides: 1 cm² : 25² km² = 1 cm² : 625 km².

area on the map =41 285625 = 66.056 cm² (exactly; 66.1 cm² to 3 s.f.)

Why this works. The two parts are the same scale used in opposite directions. Map to ground multiplies, and the conversion comes once at the end, because 2 500 000 counts centimetres. For the area, square the converted scale first: 1 cm : 25 km becomes 1 cm² : 625 km², so 625 is what divides 41 285.

G3 N2020 · Paper 1 · Q17 4 marks

A map has a scale of 1 : 2 000 000.

  1. The distance between Singapore and Phuket is 950 km.
    Calculate the distance, in centimetres, between Singapore and Phuket on the map. [2]
  2. The area of Malaysia is 330 803 km².
    Calculate the area, in square centimetres, of Malaysia on the map. [2]
Worked solution

(a) 1 cm : 2 000 000 cm = 1 cm : 20 000 m = 1 cm : 20 km.

This time the journey is ground to map, so divide:

distance on the map =95020 = 47.5 cm

(b) Squaring the scale: 1 cm² : 20² km² = 1 cm² : 400 km².

area on the map =330 803400 = 827.0075 cm² (exactly; 827 cm² to 3 s.f.)

Why this works. Each part turns on one decision, multiply or divide, and asking which of the two numbers has to be bigger settles it: the ground is bigger than the map, so going to the map divides. Part (b) is the same square as N2016/P1/Q20(b) — convert 1 : 2 000 000 into 1 cm : 20 km first, then square the 20. Nothing here needs rounding.

G3 N2024 · Paper 1 · Q6 4 marks

A map of Singapore has a scale of 1 : 200 000.

  1. The scale can be written in the form 1 cm : n km.
    Find the value of n. [1]
  2. The distance on the map from Changi Airport to Bukit Panjang is 18.9 cm.
    Calculate the actual distance, in kilometres, between these two places. [1]
  3. The area of Singapore is 728.6 km².
    Calculate the area, in square centimetres, of Singapore on the map. [2]
Worked solution

(a) 1 cm : 200 000 cm = 1 cm : 2000 m = 1 cm : 2 km, so n = 2.

(b) Map to ground, so multiply: 18.9 × 2 = 37.8 km.

(c) Square the scale: 1 cm² : 2² km² = 1 cm² : 4 km².

area on the map =728.64 = 182.15 cm² (exactly)

Why this works. Part (a) carries the rest: once the scale reads 1 cm : 2 km, (b) is a multiplication and (c) is that same 2 squared. Getting there is two conversions — 200 000 cm is 2000 m, and 2000 m is 2 km — or one division by 100 000. In (c) the number that divides is 4, and every answer is exact.