Light travels 9 460 730 472 580 800 metres in a year; a hydrogen atom's radius is
about 0.000 000 000 053 m. An index writes repeated multiplication once, the
five Laws of Indices combine those short forms, and standard form does the same
for base 10. Syllabus outcomes N1 1.8, 1.9 and 1.10, plus compound interest.
The four questions this chapter answers
Formula sheet: compound interest onlyExact answers here
The question
Where it is answered
The tool
How do I combine powers without writing out all the factors?
The paper's own formulae page holds mensuration, trigonometry and statistics, and — as
its very first entry — the compound interest formula used in 1.4. The five Laws
of Indices, the three definitions and the meaning of standard form are not printed there, so
they are carried in your head.
Indices work is nearly all exact, so most answers in 1.1 and 1.2 are left as whole
numbers, fractions or powers with nothing rounded. Standard-form calculations that do not
come out exact are the exception: give those to 3 s.f. unless the question names a
different accuracy, rounding once, on the last line.
Index notation — the recap ⓘ Recap
Everything in this chapter rests on one piece of shorthand you already have.
The index notation of
(n factors), where a is a real number and n is a positive integer, is
.
The number a is the base and n is the index (plural:
indices).
Fig. 1.1
54 is read "5 to the power of 4". The base says what is being
multiplied; the index says how many factors there are. Numbers with a base of 5,
such as 51, 52 and 53, are called powers of 5.
An index is not a multiplier. 210 is 1024, not 20 — and that gap is
what makes the notation worth having.
Where this comes from
The textbook opens the chapter with a donation that doubles every day. Thirty
doublings of a single cent is 230 cents — 1 073 741 824 cents, about
$10.7 million. Thirty times a cent would have been 30 cents, which is the
same gap between 210 and 20, drawn out far enough to see.
The five Laws of Indices
Each law is counting factors, written in shorthand. Here are all five, with the condition
each one needs.
In symbols
In words
What must match
Law 1
multiplying → add the indices
the two bases
Law 2
,
or
dividing → subtract the indices
the two bases
Law 3
a power of a power → multiply the indices
—
Law 4
multiplying → multiply the bases, index unchanged
the two indices
Law 5
dividing → divide the bases, index unchanged
the two indices
The conditions, exactly as the textbook states them. In Laws 1–5 the indices
m and n are positive integers. In Law 2 the base a is a real number with
a ≠ 0 and m > n; in Law 5 the bases are real with b ≠ 0.
Laws 1, 3 and 4 hold for any real bases. Section 1.2 lifts all five
laws to zero, negative and rational indices — and tightens the conditions on the bases
when it does.
Walkthrough 1 — Law 1 with coefficients Basic
Simplify 8m5n3 × 3m2n4,
leaving your answer in index notation.
8m5n3 × 3m2n4
= 8 × 3 × m5 × m2 × n3 × n4
Multiplication is commutative, so the factors may be reordered
freely. Gathering the numbers together and each letter with its own kind puts every
pair of matching bases side by side — the one condition Law 1 needs.
= 24m5 + 2n3 + 4 (Law 1 of Indices)
8 × 3 = 24 is ordinary multiplication: the 24 is a
coefficient, not a base, so it never collects an index. For the letters, Law 1
adds the indices because the bases match.
= 24m7n7
5 + 2 = 7 and 3 + 4 = 7. "In index notation" means this is the
answer — writing the seven factors of m back out would be undoing the whole
point of the notation.
Walkthrough 2 — Law 2 with coefficients Basic
Simplify 15p6q5 ÷ 5p4q2,
leaving your answer in index notation.
15p6q5 ÷ 5p4q2 =
Written inline, "÷ 5p4q2" is easy to
read as dividing by the 5 only. As a single fraction, every factor of the
divisor is visibly underneath, which is what the next step depends on.
=
×
×
Split the one fraction into three, each holding a single base. A
fraction may be split like this because multiplication and division travel together
— and now each piece is exactly the shape Law 2 describes.
= 3 × p6 − 4 × q5 − 2
(Law 2 of Indices)
15 ÷ 5 = 3 for the coefficients. For each letter, Law 2 subtracts
the index below from the index above — in that order, because
subtraction is not symmetrical.
= 3p2q3
6 − 4 = 2 and 5 − 2 = 3. The answer is exact and in index
notation, so nothing further is wanted.
Walkthrough 3 — Laws 1 to 3, with a letter in the index Intermediate
Simplify (6k)4 × (63)k ÷ (62)k,
leaving your answer in index notation.
(6k)4 × (63)k ÷ (62)k
= 6k × 4 × 63 × k ÷ 62 × k
(Law 3 of Indices)
Law 3 clears every bracket by multiplying the two indices. Doing this
first is what turns three differently-shaped terms into three plain powers of the same
base, 6.
= 64k × 63k ÷ 62k
Tidy each index. A letter in an index behaves like a letter anywhere
else: 4 × k is written 4k, and it is still a single index.
= 64k + 3k − 2k
(Laws 1 & 2 of Indices)
Law 1 adds the indices of the two factors being multiplied and Law 2
subtracts the index of the divisor. The base 6 is written once and never
changes — only the index is doing any work.
= 65k
4k + 3k − 2k = 5k, collecting like terms in the index.
Index notation is the only possible answer here: with k unknown, there is no
number to evaluate.
Walkthrough 4 — Laws 1 to 4 on a fraction Intermediate
Law 4 hands the outside index to every factor inside the bracket
— the number in front included, so the −2 and the 2 are raised as well.
=
(Law 3)
Law 3 multiplies the indices of a power of a power:
(b3)2 = b6. The numbers are
ordinary arithmetic, and an odd index keeps a minus sign:
(−2)3 = −8.
=
(Law 1)
The numerator is now a product of matching bases, so Law 1 adds:
2 + 9 = 11 and 6 + 3 = 9. The minus sign travels with the coefficient, never with an
index.
=
× a11 − 4 × b9 − 4
(Law 2)
Divide the coefficients as ordinary numbers and subtract the indices
base by base — top index minus bottom index.
= −2a7b5
−8 ÷ 4 = −2, 11 − 4 = 7 and 9 − 4 = 5.
The sign is written once, in front, and the answer is left in index notation.
Walkthrough 5 — all five laws together Advanced
Simplify
,
leaving your answer in index notation.
Law 5, read as
:
an index outside a fraction goes to the top and the bottom, not to one of
them.
=
(Laws 4 & 3)
Law 4 spreads the index 5 over both factors of the numerator and Law 3
multiplies the indices: (−2)5 = −32 (odd index, sign kept),
(m3)5 = m15 and (n2)5 =
n10.
=
Dividing by a fraction is multiplying by its reciprocal —
the second fraction is turned upside down. Doing this before any index work means
every factor ends up unambiguously on the top or on the bottom of one product.
=
(Law 1)
Multiply the two numerators and the two denominators, then use Law 1 on
the top: m15 × m = m15 + 1 = m16.
A letter written with no index has an index of 1.
= −4m9n4
−32 ÷ 8 = −4, and Law 2 subtracts the indices:
16 − 7 = 9 and 14 − 10 = 4. Every index in the answer is a positive
integer, so no further tidying is needed.
Where this comes from
Each law is nothing more than counting factors, which is why you can always rebuild one you
have forgotten. Written out, 72 × 74 is
(7 × 7) × (7 × 7 × 7 × 7): two factors then four factors, so
six factors altogether — and 2 + 4 = 6. That is Law 1.
Laws 4 and 5 are the two that read backwards as often as forwards, so learn both directions:
and
.
Read left to right they are how a bracket is opened; read right to left they are how
two separate powers are gathered.
Why this works. The mark is for keeping the two halves of the
term apart: 3 and 5 multiply as ordinary numbers, while Law 1
takes the matching letters and adds 5 + 3 = 8. Multiplying the indices instead gives
15y15. Writing the y5 + 3 line names the
law you used.
The four errors this topic is built to catch
Each of these four is a law used without its condition. Read the right-hand column
and the condition is always the thing that was missing.
Wrong
Right
What went wrong
23 × 54 = 107
23 × 53 = 103, but
23 × 54 will not combine at all
Law 1 needs the same base; Law 4 needs the same index. With neither
matching, there is no law to use.
(x2)3 = x5
(x2)3 = x6
Adding the indices is Law 1 (a product of two powers). A power of a
power is Law 3, and it multiplies.
(2x2)3 = 2x6
(2x2)3 = 8x6
Law 4 gives the index to every factor inside the bracket. The coefficient is a
factor, so it is cubed too.
(a + b)2 = a2 + b2
(a + b)2 = a2 + 2ab + b2
There is no law of indices for a sum. Test it: (3 + 4)2 = 49, but
32 + 42 = 25.
Brackets decide what the base is. In 2x4 only the x is
raised: 2 × x4. In (2x)4 the whole of
2x is the base: 16x4.
An even index removes a minus sign; an odd index keeps it. (−2)4 = 16,
the same as 24, but (−2)5 = −32.
More detail
The same reading of brackets settles −32 against (−3)2:
in −32 only the 3 is squared, so it is −9, while
(−3)2 squares the whole of −3 and gives 9.
Because an even index removes the sign, an answer can often be written two ways and both
are right: (−2)4 and 24 are both 16, so either may be left as
the answer. An odd index is different — (−2)5 = −32 is
not 25.
=
= −4 × x7 − 1 × y5 − 2 = −4x6y3 (Law 2). Remember x counts as
x1.
Simplify (2c3d4)5.
Answer
= 25(c3)5(d4)5
(Law 4) = 32c15d20 (Law 3) = 32c15d20. The coefficient 2 is raised to the
fifth power as well: 25 = 32, not 2.
Simplify
.
Answer
Numerator: (3h2k)3 =
27h6k3 and (−2hk4)2 =
4h2k8, so the numerator is 108h8k11.
Denominator: (6h3k2)2 = 36h6k4.
108 ÷ 36 = 3, 8 − 6 = 2, 11 − 4 = 7, so
= 3h2k7. Note (−2)2 = +4: an even
index removes the minus sign.
Given that y9 × (y2)n ÷
(y3)2 = y17, find the value of n.
Answer
y9 × y2n ÷
y6 = y9 + 2n − 6 = y3 + 2n
Same base, so the indices are equal: 3 + 2n = 17
2n = 14, n = 7.
Explain why a4 × b4 can be written as
(ab)4, but a4 × b3 cannot be written as
(ab)4 or as (ab)7.
Answer
Law 4 combines two powers with the same index
by multiplying the bases, and 4 = 4, so a4 × b4 =
(ab)4. Law 1 combines two powers with the same base by adding
the indices, and here the bases differ. In a4 × b3
neither the bases nor the indices match, so no law applies and the expression is
already in its simplest form. Check with numbers: 24 × 33 =
432, while 64 = 1296 and 67 = 279 936.
The zero index
You cannot multiply 3 by itself zero times, so the zero index is not discovered
— it is defined, in the one way that keeps the five laws working.
Definition 1.
,
where the base a is a real number such that a ≠ 0.
Walkthrough 6 — the zero index Basic
Evaluate 3 × 70 − (−5)0 + (2y)0without using a calculator, given that y ≠ 0.
70 = 1 and (−5)0 = 1
With no calculator allowed, the mark is for quoting Definition 1:
for every real base
except 0. The bracket in (−5)0 makes −5 the base, and it is not
zero, so the definition applies to it too.
(2y)0 = 1
The bracket makes the whole of 2y the base, so the term
collapses to 1. Without it, 2y0 would mean 2 ×
y0 = 2. The condition y ≠ 0 is what lets Definition 1
apply here.
3 × 70 − (−5)0 + (2y)0
= 3 × 1 − 1 + 1
Substitute the three values back in. Replacing every zero-index term
before doing any arithmetic keeps all three uses of the definition visible to the
marker.
= 3
3 − 1 + 1 = 3. The value is exact, so it is left as 3 — there
is nothing here to round.
Where this comes from
"a multiplied by itself n times" stops making sense the moment
n is not a positive whole number. Follow the pattern down a column of powers of
3 instead, dividing by 3 each time, and the value of 30 is forced:
Index form
34
33
32
31
30
Value
81
27
9
3
1
The algebra says the same thing. For a ≠ 0, a number divided by itself is 1:
And that is why a ≠ 0. The argument divides by
an, which is only legal when a is not zero.
00 is left undefined.
Negative indices
Dividing a power of 3 by 3 once more takes the index below zero. As with the zero index,
what a negative index means is defined so that the five laws carry on working.
Definition 2.
,
where the base a is a real number such that a ≠ 0, and n is a positive
integer.
A negative index does not make a number negative. It makes it a
reciprocal. 2−3 is ,
which is small and positive; −23 is −8, which is negative. Read the
minus sign as "one over", every time.
A negative index turns a fraction upside down.
Not a sixth law: it is Definition 2 followed by Law 5, as Walkthrough 7 shows line by line.
Walkthrough 7 — a negative index on a fraction Basic
Evaluate
without using a calculator, giving your answer as a fraction.
Definition 2,
,
applied with the whole fraction as the base. The minus sign has now been used up; the
rest of the question is ordinary index work.
(Law 5 of Indices)
Law 5 sends the index 3 to the numerator and to the denominator
separately, so the cube of the fraction becomes a fraction of two cubes.
Dividing by a fraction is multiplying by its reciprocal. This is the
line that turns
into
— the "flip it over" shortcut,
proved rather than assumed.
53 = 125 and 23 = 8. "As a fraction" means the
exact value
(or 15) is wanted — not the
decimal 15.625.
Walkthrough 8 — the laws with negative indices Intermediate
Simplify 27p−4q5 ÷ (3p3q)2,
expressing your answer in positive index form.
(3p3q)2 = 32(p3)2q2
= 9p6q2 (Laws 4 & 3)
Clear the bracket first. Law 4 gives the index 2 to every factor inside,
the 3 included, and Law 3 doubles the index of p3.
=
Writing the division as one fraction puts the whole of the simplified
divisor underneath, so nothing can be left out when the indices are subtracted.
=
× p−4 − 6 × q5 − 2
(Law 2)
Law 2 still applies once zero and negative indices are defined —
subtract the bottom index from the top one, signs and all.
= 3p−10q3
27 ÷ 9 = 3, −4 − 6 = −10 and 5 − 2 = 3.
Watch that first subtraction: taking 6 away from −4 moves further down the
number line, not back up towards zero.
Definition 2 turns p−10 into
.
"Positive index form" means no index in the final answer may be negative, so the
p has to move to the denominator — and only the p, because
q3 is already positive.
Where this comes from
Carry the powers-of-3 pattern one step further, still dividing by 3 each time:
Index form
32
31
30
3−1
3−2
Value
9
3
1
And again the algebra agrees. Cancelling factors,
,
while Law 2 gives
.
The two must agree, and Definition 2 is what makes them agree.
Past-paper questions
G3N2017 · Paper 1 · Q11 mark
Given that =
3k, find k. [1]
Worked solution
81 = 3 × 3 × 3 × 3 = 34, so
(Definition 2)
3k = 3−4, and the bases match, so
k = −4.
Check: 3−4 =
=
, the given number.
Why this works. First write both sides to the same base:
81 = 34. Then Definition 2,
,
reads the reciprocal as a negative index: the 4 changes sign and nothing else.
Check your answer against k = 4 and
k = — the reciprocal
ignored, or a negative index read as a root.
Rational indices
The last gap is an index that is not a whole number at all. What
means comes from
roots.
If a is a non-negative number such that a = bn for some non-negative
number b, then b is the positive nth root of a:
Definition 3.
where the base a is a real number such that a ≥ 0, and n is a positive
integer.
And in general.
where the base a is a real number such that a ≥ 0, and m and n are
positive integers.
Bottom is the root, top is the power. In
the 3 underneath is the cube root and the 4 on top is the power. Either order
gives the same value; taking the root first keeps the numbers small.
Walkthrough 9 — evaluating a rational index Intermediate
Evaluate
without using a calculator.
Use
:
denominator underneath is the root, numerator on top is the power. With no calculator
allowed, take the root first — the other order would mean cubing 125 by hand.
,
since 125 = 5 × 5 × 5
The cube root is found by prime factorisation: 125 splits into three
equal factors of 5, and three equal factors is exactly what a cube root asks for.
= 54
The 4 from the top of the index is an ordinary power, now applied to the
root just found.
= 625
54 = 625. A rational index of a perfect power gives an exact
answer, so 625 is the whole answer — there is nothing to round.
Where this comes from
The positive square root of 9 is 3, because 3 × 3 = 9, and the positive 4th root of
81 is 3, because 3 × 3 × 3 × 3 = 81:
Now let P stand for 5 raised to the index one third. Cubing it, and using Law 3
to multiply the two indices:
so P must be the cube root of 5. That is the only value the index
can be given without breaking Law 3, which
is what Definition 3 records. The textbook's memory hook for the general form is that the
denominator is "below the ground", which is where roots live.
Why the base must be non-negative. If negative bases were allowed, both
and Law 3 could be used to "prove" that 1 = −1. The conditions on the base are what
keep the laws honest.
The laws, extended to every rational index
With the three definitions in place, all five laws survive — but the conditions on the
bases tighten, because zero and negative indices need
a ≠ 0 while rational indices need a ≥ 0. Combining both gives
a > 0.
Positive integer indices
Any rational indices
Law 1
, any real base
same, if a > 0
Law 2
, if a ≠ 0 and m > n
same, if a > 0 — and m > n is no longer needed
Law 3
, any real base
same, if a > 0
Law 4
, any real bases
same, if a > 0 and b > 0
Law 5
, if b ≠ 0
same, if a > 0 and b > 0
Walkthrough 10 — a negative and fractional index Advanced
Simplify
,
expressing your answer in positive index form.
A negative index on a fraction inverts the fraction:
.
Clearing the minus sign first means only one awkward thing — the quarter index
— is left to deal with.
(Law 5)
Law 5 sends the index to the numerator and the denominator separately.
It is allowed here because both parts are positive.
(Law 4)
Law 4 hands the quarter index to every factor of the denominator
— the 16 as well as the x8, exactly as a coefficient inside
a bracket gets cubed.
(Law 3)
Law 3 multiplies the indices:
12 × = 3 and
8 × = 2. Fractional indices very
often cancel down to whole numbers like this — that is how the question was
built.
By Definition 3,
,
since 16 = 2 × 2 × 2 × 2. Every index in the answer is now a positive
whole number, which is what "positive index form" asks for.
Why this works
Why m > n can be dropped from Law 2. With only positive
indices allowed,
had no answer to give. Now it does: a−4. Extending the
definitions is exactly what removes the restriction.
Past-paper questions
G3N2018 · Paper 1 · Q22 marks
Simplify
.
[2]
Worked solution
(the negative index inverts the fraction)
(Law 5, then Law 3 on each part)
,
since 6 × = 9 and
8 × = 12.
Why this works. Two marks, two decisions. Deal with the
sign of the index first by turning the fraction upside down,
;
then multiply each index by
(Law 3). Both indices are even, so the answer has whole-number
indices — a fraction left in an index means the multiplication went the other
way.
G3N2024 · Paper 2 · Q1(c)2 marks
Simplify
.
[2]
Worked solution
(the negative index inverts the fraction)
(Laws 5 and 4, then Law 3)
,
12 × = 8 and
9 × = 6, so
Why this works. Same two decisions as the 2018 question, plus
the 64: the index is handed to every factor of the denominator, the
number included, so 64 × is not
it. Read
as "cube root first, then square" — the cube root of 64 is 4 and
42 = 16. Taking the root before the power keeps the arithmetic small.
Equations with the unknown in the index
To solve x2 = 100 you take a square root, because the unknown is the
base. In 2x = 32 the unknown is the index, so the move
instead is to make both sides powers of the same base.
If
then x = n, provided the base a is not 0, 1 or −1.
Walkthrough 11 — solving for an unknown index Intermediate
Solve 8x = .
8 = 23 and 32 = 25
The unknown is in the index, so the two sides can only be compared once
they are powers of one common base. Both 8 and 32 are powers of 2, so 2 is that
base.
(23)x =
Rewrite each side using base 2. Nothing has changed in value —
only the way the two numbers are written.
23x = 2−5
(Law 3, then Definition 2)
Law 3 multiplies the indices on the left. On the right, Definition 2
read backwards turns
into 2−5. Both sides are now a single power of 2.
3x = −5
Same base, and that base is not 0, 1 or −1, so the indices must be
equal. This is the line that removes the index altogether and leaves an ordinary linear
equation.
Divide both sides by 3. Leave it as the exact fraction
−
(or −1); −1.67 would only
be an approximation to an answer that is exact.
Why this works
Why those three bases are barred. 14 = 19 without 4 being 9,
and 03 = 07; (−1)2 = (−1)4. For
every other base, one value of the index gives one value of the power, so the indices can
safely be equated.
Check yourself
Evaluate 5 × 90 + (−3)0 − (4k)0
without using a calculator, given that k ≠ 0.
Answer
Evaluate
without using a calculator, giving your answer as a fraction.
Answer
(Definition 2)
=
.
Simplify
,
expressing your answer in index form, given that c > 0.
Answer
Rewrite both factors as indices:
and
.
Law 1 adds the indices:
=
.
Solve 9x =
.
Answer
9 = 32 and 27 = 33, so
(32)x =
32x = 3−3
2x = −3 x = −
(or −1.5).
Past-paper questions
G3N2019 · Paper 1 · Q32 marks
Simplify
.
[1]
3a = 37 + 37 + 37
Find the value of a. [1]
Worked solution
(a) Law 3 multiplies the indices:
6 × = 4, so
= .
(b) The right-hand side is three copies of the same number:
37 + 37 + 37 = 3 × 37
= 31 + 7 = 38 (Law 1)
So 3a = 38, and since the bases match,
a = 8.
Why this works. Part (b) is set because
there is no index law for adding powers: the three terms are identical, so the
sum is a multiplication, 3 × 37, and multiplication does have a law.
Once both sides are a single power of 3 the indices can be compared. Steer clear of
a = 21, which reads the plus signs as times signs.
G3N2022 · Paper 1 · Q232 marks
Given that 252x = 1257, find x.
[2]
Worked solution
25 = 52 and 125 = 53, so both sides can be written to base 5:
(52)2x = (53)7
54x = 521 (Law 3)
4x = 21, so x = 5.25
(or ).
Why this works. The unknown is in the index, so it
needs a common base: 25 and 125 are both powers of 5, and writing each
side to base 5 earns the first mark. Law 3 then makes each side a single power and the
indices can be equated. 2 × 2x = 4x, and an index
may be a fraction: 5.25 is right.
G3N2023 · Paper 1 · Q33 marks
Simplify (2c3d2)3[1]
16 × 54 + 9 × 252 = 5k
Use the laws of indices to find the value of k.
Show your working. [2]
Worked solution
(a) Law 4 hands the outside index to every factor inside the bracket:
(2c3d2)3
= 23 × (c3)3 ×
(d2)3= 8c9d6
(b) 25 = 52, so 252 = (52)2 =
54 (Law 3). Both terms now carry the same power of 5:
Why this works. "Show your working" makes part (b) a
three-line answer rather than a number. There is no law for adding powers, so give the
two terms a common factor — which needs 252 rewritten as
54 — and take it out. Hold on to the last step: 25 is 52,
not a left-over coefficient, and folding it in makes one power.
What standard form is
Singapore's population in June 2020 was about 5 850 000; the mass of an oxygen atom is about
0.000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 026 56 kg. Standard form is what removes the zero-counting
from both.
A number is said to be expressed in standard form when it is
written as
,
where 1 ≤ A < 10 and n is an integer.
Written as
Standard form?
Why
6.3 × 104
yes
1 ≤ 6.3 < 10, and 4 is an integer
63 × 103
no
A = 63 is not less than 10 → 6.3 × 104
0.72 × 10−5
no
A = 0.72 is less than 1 → 7.2 × 10−6
1.0 × 1012
yes
1 ≤ 1.0 < 10; an A of exactly 1 is allowed
8.4 × 102.5
no
the index must be an integer
4.5 × 27
no
the base must be 10
A negative index means a small number, not a negative one.
5.3 × 10−11 is 0.000 000 000 053 — positive, and tiny. A
negative number in standard form carries its minus sign on the A:
−5.3 × 1011.
Why this works
Both conditions do real work. "1 ≤ A < 10" forces exactly one non-zero
digit in front of the decimal point, so every number has exactly one standard form
and two numbers can be compared at a glance. "n is an integer" is what lets
Law 1 and Law 2 be used on the powers of ten.
Converting, both ways
Converting to standard form is counting: how many places must the decimal point move to
leave exactly one non-zero digit in front of it?
Fig. 1.2
Count the places the decimal point has to travel to sit just after the first
non-zero digit. Travelling left gives a positive index; travelling
right gives a negative one. The number itself never changes — only the
way it is written.
Check the sign of the index. A number bigger than 10 ends up with a positive
index; a number smaller than 1 ends up with a negative one. So 0.000 061 is
6.1 × 10−5, never 6.1 × 105.
Walkthrough 12 — converting both ways Basic
(a) Express 58 400 000 in
standard form.
(b) Express 9.06 × 10−5 in
ordinary notation.
58 400 000 = 5.84 × 10 000 000
Standard form allows exactly one non-zero digit in front of the decimal
point, so the point goes straight after the 5. Everything taken out of the number has
to be given back as a multiplier — here, ten million.
= 5.84 × 107
10 000 000 has 7 zeros, so it is 107 — the same 7 as
the places the point moved left. A = 5.84 is between 1 and 10 and the index
is an integer, so this is standard form.
9.06 × 10−5 = 9.06 ÷ 105
By Definition 2 a negative power of ten is a division:
10−5 =
.
Dividing is what makes the number small; the number itself is still positive.
= 0.000 090 6
Dividing by 105 moves the decimal point 5 places to the left,
so four zeros appear between the point and the 9. Ordinary notation means every digit
written out with no power of ten left anywhere.
Why this works
Multiplying by 10 moves every digit one place up the place-value columns, which looks like
the decimal point moving one place to the right; dividing by 10 moves it one place
to the left. Each move is one factor of 10, so the number of moves is the
index — which is why counting places and counting powers give the same answer.
Past-paper questions
G3N2021 · Paper 2 · Q2(a)1 mark
The value of fuels and lubricants exported from Singapore in 2017 was
$90 182 million.
Write $90 182 million in standard form correct to 3 significant figures.
[1]
Why this works. The word million is worth
106 and has to become a power before anything is counted; then
90 182 = 9.0182 × 104, and Law 1 adds 4 + 6 = 10. Round
last and round only A: 9.0182 to 3 s.f. is 9.02, and the
× 1010 is not part of the count. Keep the dollar sign.
Arithmetic in standard form
There are only two situations here, and they behave completely differently: × and
÷ on one side, + and − on the other.
Multiplying and dividing. Handle the A-numbers and the powers of ten separately:
The powers of ten obey Laws 1 and 2, so the indices are added when multiplying and
subtracted when dividing. The powers need not match.
Adding and subtracting. There is no law of indices for a sum. The two terms
must first be written with the same power of ten; then that power is a common factor:
Finish by re-checking A. 3.2 × 7.5 = 24, and 1.2 ÷ 6 = 0.2;
neither is between 1 and 10. Fix A and move the index to match:
24 × 103 = 2.4 × 104.
Walkthrough 13 — multiplying in standard form Basic
Calculate (3.2 × 105) × (7.5 × 10−2),
giving your answer in standard form.
= (3.2 × 7.5) × (105 × 10−2)
Multiplication may be reordered, so the two A-numbers go together
and the two powers of ten go together. Each pair is then a separate and much easier
calculation.
= 24 × 105 + (−2)
(Law 1 of Indices)
3.2 × 7.5 = 24 for the numbers, and Law 1 adds the indices of the
powers of ten because the base 10 is the same in both. Adding a negative index brings
the power down.
= 24 × 103
5 + (−2) = 3. The arithmetic on the number line is worth writing
out: it is where sign slips happen.
= 2.4 × 104
24 is not between 1 and 10, so the previous line is a correct value but
not standard form. Writing 24 as 2.4 × 101 and using Law 1 again
gives 2.4 × 101 + 3 = 2.4 × 104.
Walkthrough 14 — adding, with unequal powers Intermediate
Calculate 3.7 × 106 + 4.5 × 105,
giving your answer in standard form.
4.5 × 105 = 0.45 × 106
The two powers of ten differ, and there is no law of indices for a
sum. Raising the index from 105 to 106 multiplies by ten,
so the A-number is divided by ten to keep the value the same.
3.7 × 106 + 4.5 × 105
= 3.7 × 106 + 0.45 × 106
Substitute the rewritten term. Both terms are now "so many lots of
106", which is exactly the condition that makes them addable — the
same condition as adding like terms in algebra.
= (3.7 + 0.45) × 106
106 is now a common factor of both terms, so it comes outside
a bracket and only the A-numbers are added. The power of ten is not added
to anything.
= 4.15 × 106
3.7 + 0.45 = 4.15, and 1 ≤ 4.15 < 10, so this is already in
standard form and no adjusting of the index is needed. (A quick check: the answer
should be a little more than 3.7 million, and it is.)
Walkthrough 15 — subtracting, then dividing Intermediate
Evaluate
,
giving your answer in standard form,
correct to 3 significant figures.
5.2 × 10−4 = 0.52 × 10−3
The numerator is a subtraction, so both terms need the same power
of ten before anything can be taken away. Raising the index from
10−4 to 10−3 is compensated by moving the decimal
point of 5.2 one place to the left.
With a common power of ten, 10−3 is a common factor and
only the A-numbers are subtracted. 5.88 is between 1 and 10, so the numerator is
itself in standard form.
Split the division into "numbers ÷ numbers" and
"power ÷ power". The whole numerator had to be collapsed into one term first
— dividing each of its two pieces by 2.7 × 102 separately would
be a different, longer calculation.
= 2.1777… × 10−5
(Law 2: −3 − 2 = −5)
Law 2 subtracts the indices of the powers of ten, and 5.88 ÷ 2.7
does not terminate. Carry the extra decimals on this line: rounding here and then
continuing is what pushes a final answer outside the accepted range.
= 2.18 × 10−5 (3 s.f.)
Round once, here: 2.1777… to 3 s.f. is 2.18. Count the
significant figures on the A-number only — the
× 10−5 is not part of them.
Why this works
Laws 1 and 2 are laws about products of powers, which is why multiplying and
dividing can treat the A-numbers and the powers of ten as two separate jobs. A
sum has no such law, so the only way through is to make the power of ten a common
factor — the same move as collecting like terms in algebra, with
10n playing the part of the letter.
The final tidy-up goes both ways: 24 × 103 = 2.4 × 104
when A is too big, and 0.2 × 103 = 2 × 102
when it is too small. Each time the digits move one way and the index moves the other, so
the value never changes.
Past-paper questions
G3N2015 · Paper 1 · Q42 marks
A field has an area of 1400 m².
An average of 60 dandelion plants grow on each square metre.
Each plant has an average of 20 flowers.
Joel estimates that these plants will produce 2 × 108 seeds in
total.
Calculate an estimate of the average number of seeds produced by each flower.
[2]
Worked solution
Number of flowers = 1400 × 60 × 20 = 1 680 000
= 1.68 × 106
Average number of seeds per flower
(Law 2: 8 − 6 = 2)
= 1.190 47… × 102 = 119.047…
= 119 (3 s.f.)
Why this works. An average is a total divided by a count, so
the work is deciding what to divide by: the flowers,
1400 × 60 × 20. Writing that as 1.68 × 106 splits the
division in two — A-numbers divide, Law 2 subtracts the indices. The
answer counts seeds, so it is not standard form; it is not exact, so 119.047…
becomes 119.
G3N2019 · Paper 2 · Q3(c)6 marks
The table shows information about telecommunications in Singapore.
Year
2010
2015
Mobile phone subscriptions
7.29 × 106
8.21 × 106
SMS messages sent
2.77 × 1010
1.14 × 1010
Broadband subscriptions
7.85 × 106
1.20 × 107
Calculate how many more mobile phone subscriptions there were in 2015
than in 2010. Give your answer in standard form. [1]
Calculate the percentage increase in the number of broadband
subscriptions from 2010 to 2015. [2]
The population of Singapore in 2015 was 5.54 × 106.
Calculate the mean number of SMS messages sent per person per day in 2015.
[3]
Worked solution
(a) Both figures already carry 106, so the
A-numbers subtract directly:
8.21 × 106 − 7.29 × 106
= 0.92 × 106= 9.2 × 105
(b) Write 1.20 × 107 as 12.0 × 106 so that
the two broadband figures share an index:
Increase = 12.0 × 106 − 7.85 × 106
= 4.15 × 106
Percentage increase =
× 100% = 52.866…%
= 52.9% (3 s.f.)
(c) A year is 365 days, so the number of person-days in 2015 is
5.54 × 106 × 365 = 2.0221 × 109.
Mean
= 5.64 messages per person per day (3 s.f.)
Why this works. Terms in standard form add or subtract only
once their powers of ten match. In (a) they already do, so the work is at the end:
0.92 × 106 becomes 9.2 × 105. In (b) rewrite
1.20 × 107 as 12.0 × 106 first, measuring the
increase against 2010; (c) needs the right row, the right year and
per day.
G3N2023 · Paper 2 · Q1(b)2 marks
Population density is defined as the number of people per square
kilometre.
In 2020, the population density of Singapore was 7810 people per square
kilometre.
In 2020, the total population of Singapore was 5.69 million.
Calculate the area of Singapore. [2]
Worked solution
The definition says
,
so
.
Population = 5.69 million = 5.69 × 106
Area
= 729 km² (3 s.f.)
Why this works. The question hands you the definition, so the
first mark is for turning it the right way round: people per km² means population
over area, so area is population over density. The units are the check
— people ÷ (people / km²) leaves km². "5.69 million" becomes
5.69 × 106 before dividing, and the rounding happens once, at the
end.
G3N2024 · Paper 1 · Q183 marks
Write 263 in standard form. [1]
Write 3.4 × 1099 in the form
A × 10100. [1]
Work out (4.7 × 10100) + (3.4 × 1099).
Give your answer in standard form. [1]
Worked solution
(a) The point moves two places left, from 263. to 2.63, so the index is 2:
2.63 × 102
(b)(i) The index is to go up by one, from 99 to 100, so the
A-number must come down by a factor of ten:
0.34 × 10100
Why this works. Part (b)(i) hands you an illegal
intermediate on purpose: 0.34 is not a legal A, but matching the
indices is the only way to add at 10100. Watch the direction of the trade
— index up means the number in front gets smaller
(3.4 → 0.34); the other way gives 38.7 × 10100. Then check
A: 5.04 is legal.
Doing it on the calculator
Every scientific calculator has a dedicated standard-form key, usually marked
×10x (older models: EXP or EE). One
keystroke enters "× 10 to the power of", and the display then shows the answer in
standard form.
To enter
Press
Not
3.2 × 105
3 . 2 ×10x 5
3.2 × 10 ×10x 5, which is ten times too big
4.19 × 10−4
4 . 1 9 ×10x(−) 4
the subtraction key −, which the calculator reads as an operation
a whole numerator over a whole denominator
put brackets round each, or use the fraction key
typing it straight across, which divides by the first term only
Write the working, not just the answer. Put the substitution line on the page, and
write the unrounded value before you round it. A method that is right but for one digit still
earns most of the marks.
Significant figures are counted on A only. So
6.817 03 × 10−6 becomes 6.82 × 10−6, and
0.000 06 × 103 is not an answer at all until A is fixed.
More detail
The keys vary between models, so check the manual for yours. On nearly all of them the
×10x key already contains the × 10, which is why
pressing × 10 as well gives an answer ten times too big.
Past-paper questions
G3N2020 · Paper 1 · Q11 mark
Calculate
.
[1]
Worked solution
Inside the root:
(−11)2 − 4 × 16 × (−50)
= 121 + 3200 = 3321, and
Why this works. The single mark is for typing it as one
expression: brackets round the whole numerator, brackets round 2 × 16, or the
fraction key. Watch both signs — −(−11) is +11, and
−4 × 16 × (−50) is +3200, so the number under the root is
bigger than 121. Keep 57.628… unrounded on the way through, and round
once, to 3 s.f.
G3N2022 · Paper 1 · Q11 mark
Calculate
.
[1]
Worked solution
Inside the root: 12.52 = 156.25 and
,
so
12.52 −
= 156.25 − 183.783… = −27.5337…
A fifth root is an odd root, so a negative number has one:
= −1.94 (3 s.f.)
Check: (−1.9407…)5 = −27.53…, the number under
the root.
Why this works. The whole bracket sits under the root, so work
out 12.52 − 6.8 ÷ 0.037 first and take the fifth root of that.
The result is negative, and is
with an
odd denominator, so a negative number does have one. Some calculators refuse
:
take the root of 27.5337… and put the minus sign back.
Standard form in the real world
Once every quantity is written as A × 10n, the index alone tells
you the magnitude — roughly how big something is — and two quantities can
be compared without reading a single zero.
Fig. 1.3
The index is the magnitude. A person is more than 1010 times as
long as a hydrogen atom's radius, and a light-year is about 1016 times as long as a
person — both read straight off the scale, with no zeros counted.
SI prefixes are standard form with a name attached. Every one of them stands for a
power of ten, so a measurement given with a prefix converts to standard form in one step.
Prefix
Symbol
Power of 10
Prefix
Symbol
Power of 10
tera-
T
1012
milli-
m
10−3
giga-
G
109
micro-
µ
10−6
mega-
M
106
nano-
n
10−9
kilo-
k
103
pico-
p
10−12
Converting a prefix is Law 1. 250 megawatts = 250 × 106 W
= 2.5 × 102 × 106 W = 2.5 × 108 W. Write
the 250 in standard form first, then add the indices.
Walkthrough 16 — how far away is the nearest star? Advanced
Light travels at 3.00 × 108 m/s. A
light-year is the distance light travels in one year; take one year to be
3.15 × 107 s. Proxima Centauri, the nearest star
to the Sun, is about 4.2 light-years away. Find its distance
from the Sun in metres, giving your answer in standard formcorrect to 3 significant figures.
distance in one year = (3.00 × 108) ×
(3.15 × 107)
Distance = speed × time, so one light-year is the speed of light
multiplied by the number of seconds in a year. Both quantities are already in standard
form and both are in SI units, so nothing has to be converted first.
= (3.00 × 3.15) × (108 × 107)
= 9.45 × 1015 m
Numbers with numbers, powers with powers; Law 1 adds the indices,
8 + 7 = 15. A = 9.45 is already between 1 and 10, so one light-year is
9.45 × 1015 m.
distance to Proxima Centauri = 4.2 × (9.45 × 1015)
4.2 light-years means 4.2 lots of that distance. The 4.2 is a plain
multiplier with no power of ten attached, so it joins the A-number and leaves
the 1015 untouched.
= 39.69 × 1015
4.2 × 9.45 = 39.69. This is a correct value, but 39.69 is not
between 1 and 10, so it is not yet in the form the question asked for.
= 3.969 × 1016 = 3.97 × 1016 m
(3 s.f.)
39.69 = 3.969 × 101, and adding that 1 to the index
gives 1016. Rounding 3.969 to 3 significant figures gives 3.97, and the unit
m is part of the answer — the question asked for a distance in
metres.
Check yourself
Express (a) 0.000 000 040 7 in standard form, and (b)
6.2 × 104 in ordinary notation.
Answer
(a) The decimal point moves 8 places to the
right to sit after the 4, and the number is smaller than 1, so the index is negative:
4.07 × 10−8. (b) 6.2 × 10 000 = 62 000.
Calculate (8.4 × 10−5) ÷ (2.4 × 103),
giving your answer in standard form.
Answer
=
×
10−5 − 3
= 3.5 × 10−8 = 3.5 × 10−8. A = 3.5 is already between 1 and 10,
so nothing needs adjusting.
Calculate 5.2 × 104 − 7.5 × 103, giving your
answer in standard form.
Answer
Make the powers match:
7.5 × 103 = 0.75 × 104
= (5.2 − 0.75) × 104 = 4.45 × 104. Subtracting 5.2 − 7.5 without matching the
powers first would give a negative answer, which is nonsense here.
Given that P = 4.5 × 106 and Q = 9.0 × 10−2,
find (a)PQ and (b)
, giving each answer in standard form.
Answer
(a) (4.5 × 9.0) ×
106 + (−2) = 40.5 × 104 =
4.05 × 105. (b)
×
106 − (−2) = 0.5 × 108 =
5 × 107. Both needed the final tidy-up — one because
A was too big, the other because it was too small.
A red blood cell is about 6.2 × 10−6 m wide. How many of them,
laid side by side, would span 1 cm? Give your answer in standard form correct to
3 significant figures.
Answer
1 cm = 1 × 10−2 m, so the
number of cells is
= ×
10−2 − (−6)
= 0.161 29… × 104 = 1.612 9… × 103 ≈ 1.61 × 103 cells (3 s.f.). Converting the centimetre to
metres first is essential — the two lengths must be in the same
unit.
Explain why 47 × 105 is not in standard form, and write it correctly.
Answer
Standard form requires 1 ≤ A < 10, and
here A = 47, which is too big.
47 × 105 = 4.7 × 101 × 105 = 4.7 × 106 (Law 1). The value has not changed — only the
way it is written.
Simple interest, and what compounding changes
In Book 1 you met simple interest: the interest I a person earns from a
bank depends on the money deposited (the principalP), the interest rate
R% per annum, and the duration in years T.
Compound interest asks a different question: what if the interest earned each year is
added to the principal, so that interest is earned on the interest as well?
If the interest paid on a sum of money is compounded annually
(or yearly), then
where A is the total amount, P is the principal,
r% is the interest rate per annum and n is the number of years.
Put $1000 in the bank for 3 years at 2% and the two ideas part company:
Bank A — simple interest 2% per annum
Bank B — 2% per annum compounded yearly
Year 1
interest on $1000 = $20 → $1020
interest on $1000 = $20 → $1020
Year 2
interest on $1000 = $20 → $1040
interest on $1020 = $20.40 → $1040.40
Year 3
interest on $1000 = $20 → $1060
interest on $1040.40 = $20.81 → $1061.21
Interest earned
$60
$61.21
The principal changes every year. In the simple column the interest is worked out on
$1000 three times; in the compound column on $1000, then $1020, then $1040.40. The formula
does that repeatedly without the table.
Amount, or interest? is everything in the account at the end;
the compound interest is what was gained,
. Unless a question says
otherwise, leave money to the nearest cent.
Walkthrough 17 — finding compound interest Basic
Find the compound interest on
$4000 for 5 years at
4% per annum, compounded annually.
with P = 4000, r = 4, n = 5
"Compounded annually" means the formula is used in its plain form:
r is the rate per year and n counts years. Write
the three values down before substituting.
Substitute. The rate goes in as the number 4, not as 0.04
— the ÷ 100 is already built into the formula.
= $4866.6116…
One calculator line: the bracket is 1.04, raised to the power 5, times
4000. Keep the full display for now — this is a stepping stone, not the answer.
Compound interest
= $4866.6116… − $4000
The question asked for the interest, and the formula gave the
total amount. Subtracting the principal is the step that answers the question
actually asked.
= $866.61 (to the nearest cent)
Round once, at the end, to the nearest cent as money questions expect.
Rounding A to $4866.61 first happens to give the same answer here, but on a
longer question that habit is what shifts a final cent.
Walkthrough 18 — the long way, and why the formula agrees Basic
$800 is invested at 5% per annum,
compounded yearly. Find the amount at the end of
each of the first three years, and check the third against the
compound interest formula.
Year 1: interest = 5% of $800 = $40 →
= $800 + $40 = $840
The first year is the only one where simple and compound interest agree:
the principal really is the original $800, and 5% of 800 is 40.
Year 2: interest = 5% of $840 = $42 →
= $840 + $42 = $882
Here is the whole difference: the 5% is charged on $840, last
year's total, not on the original $800. That is what "compounded" means, and it is why
the interest rose from $40 to $42.
Year 3: interest = 5% of $882 = $44.10 →
= $882 + $44.10 = $926.10
The same move again, now on $882. Each year's interest is bigger than
the last because the base it is charged on keeps growing — the growth is not a
straight line.
The formula does those same three multiplications in one line:
multiplying by 1.05 is exactly "keep the total and add 5% of it", and doing that three
times is 1.053.
= $926.10 — the same answer
The table and the formula must agree, because the formula was built by
factorising the table. Use the table when a question asks what happens in a
particular year; use the formula when it asks for the total after
n years.
Where the formula comes from
Year by year is fine for 3 years and hopeless for 10. Follow the same three years
algebraically, taking out a common factor each time, and the pattern appears:
Total amount at the end of the 1st year,
Total amount at the end of the 2nd year,
Total amount at the end of the 3rd year,
Each line is the previous total, plus 2% of that total — and each time the
previous total comes out as a common factor. The index counts the years.
The longer story
For simple interest the interest earned every year is the same, because it is always
calculated on the original principal. Compound interest adds each year's interest to
the principal, so the next year's interest is charged on a larger sum.
Over the three years above, Bank B pays $1.21 more than Bank A. The gap is small over
3 years at a small rate — which is exactly why the question is worth asking over
10 years, or 20.
The one formula in this chapter that is printed for you. The paper gives
"Compound interest — Total amount =
"
as the first entry on its own formulae page, so no marks ride on recalling it. They go on
choosing r and n correctly, and on knowing that the formula returns
the total amount rather than the interest.
When interest is added more often than once a year
Banks rarely compound only once a year. The formula does not change — but what
r and nmean does.
If the interest is compounded monthly, then r% is the interest rate per
month and n is the number of months.
The same reading applies to every compounding period: the annual rate is shared evenly
across the periods in a year, and n counts periods.
Compounded…
periods in a year
rate r per period
n for t years
6% per annum for 4 years becomes
yearly
1
the annual rate
t
r = 6, n = 4
half-yearly
2
annual rate ÷ 2
2t
r = 3, n = 8
quarterly
4
annual rate ÷ 4
4t
r = 1.5, n = 16
monthly
12
annual rate ÷ 12
12t
r = 0.5, n = 48
Both change, or neither. Divide the annual rate by the periods in a year, and multiply
the years by that same number: r is the rate for one period, n
the number of periods. Say in your working what one period is.
$9000 is deposited in an account paying
6% compound interest per annum,
compounded half-yearly. Find the
total amount in the account after
4 years.
One period = 6 months, so r = 6 ÷ 2 = 3
"Half-yearly" means the interest is added twice a year, so each addition
is half of the annual 6%. The rate in the formula must be the rate for one
compounding period, never the annual headline rate.
n = 4 × 2 = 8 half-year periods
n counts the very periods that r describes. Four
years contains eight half-years, so the interest is added eight times. Halving the rate
without doubling n would model a bank that pays half as much interest.
Substitute the period values, not the yearly ones. The principal
is untouched by any of this — only r and n are affected by
how often the bank compounds.
= $11 400.9307…
1.03 raised to the power 8, times 9000. Keep the full display: the cents
are decided by digits not yet on screen.
= $11 400.93 (to the nearest cent)
The question asked for the total amount, so this is the answer as
it stands — no subtracting the principal here. (Compounded yearly instead, the
same deposit would reach only $11 362.29: compounding more often earns more.)
Walkthrough 20 — compounded monthly Intermediate
Find the compound interest on $2400
for 2 years at 6% per annum,
compounded monthly.
r = 6 ÷ 12 = 0.5 (per month)
Twelve compounding periods in a year, so each month carries a twelfth of
the annual rate. A rate of 0.5 is perfectly legal in this formula — r
does not have to be a whole number.
n = 2 × 12 = 24 months
Two years is twenty-four months, and interest is added at the end of
each one. Write the units beside n in your working — "24 months" makes
it obvious to you and to the marker that r is a monthly rate.
0.5 ÷ 100 = 0.005, so the bracket is 1.005 — a monthly
growth factor. Notice how close to 1 it is: a small step, taken twenty-four times.
= $2705.1834…
Evaluate in one line. Rounding 1.00524 to a few decimals
before multiplying is exactly where money answers drift by cents.
= $2705.1834… − $2400 = $305.18
"Compound interest" again means the gain, so subtract the principal and
round at the end. It is a shade more than the $296.64 that yearly compounding at the
same 6% would have given.
Working backwards, and comparing offers
The formula has four letters. Given any three, a question can ask for the fourth — and
in the real-world question at the end of Paper 2 it usually asks you to compare two
offers and say which is better.
Walkthrough 21 — finding the interest rate Intermediate
Farid invested $7000 in a fund that pays interest
compounded yearly. At the end of
4 years he received a total of
$8032.66. Find the interest rate.
The same formula, a different unknown. The total received isA, so substitute all three known values and leave r standing
— this is now an equation to solve, not a calculation to evaluate.
Divide both sides by the principal to get the bracket on its own. What is
left is the growth factor over the whole 4 years: the money ended up about
1.1475 times what it started as.
To undo a power of 4, take the 4th root — the root and the
index cancel. This is a fractional index doing the work: the 4th root is the power
, exactly as in 1.2.
,
so
Subtract the 1 that stands for the original money, leaving only the
growth, then multiply by 100 to turn the decimal back into a percentage. Keeping the 1
would read as a rate of 103.5%.
The interest rate is 3.5% per annum.
Answer in the units the question used — a rate, with a percent sign
and "per annum". (The root came out as 1.034999… rather than exactly 1.035 only
because the $8032.66 in the question was itself rounded to the nearest cent.)
Walkthrough 22 — which offer is better? Advanced
Devi has $12 000 to invest for 5 years.
Company A offers 5.2% per annum simple interest.Company B offers 5% per annum compound interest, compounded
half-yearly.(i)Which company should she invest in? Explain your answer.(ii)Calculate the difference in interest earned after 5
years.
Company A:
A is simple interest, so the compound formula does not apply to it
at all — this is the Book 1 formula, and it gives the interest directly, with no
subtraction. Deal with the two companies one at a time.
Company B: one period = 6 months, so r = 5 ÷ 2 = 2.5
and n = 5 × 2 = 10
B compounds half-yearly, so both the rate and the count must be converted
to half-years before anything is substituted. Note that B's headline rate (5%) is
lower than A's 5.2% — so the answer is not obvious, which is the point of
the question.
1.025 to the power 10, times 12 000. This is B's total amount, so
it cannot yet be set against A's $3120 — one is a total, the other an
interest.
Company B interest = $15 361.01 − $12 000 = $3361.01
Subtract the principal so that both companies are described by the same
quantity: interest earned. Comparing like with like is what this question is really
testing.
(i) $3361.01 > $3120, so Devi should invest in
Company B.
The explanation being asked for is the comparison itself: B earns more
interest over the 5 years. Compounding twice a year beats A's slightly higher rate here,
because B's interest goes on to earn interest itself.
(ii) Difference = $3361.01 − $3120 = $241.01
"Difference in interest" is a subtraction of the two interests
— not of the two totals, and not a percentage. State it as money, to the nearest
cent.
Check yourself — 1.4
Find the compound interest on $3000 for 4 years at 5% per annum, compounded annually.
Answer
A = 3000(1 + 5/100)4
= 3000 × 1.054 = $3646.5187… I = A − P = 3646.5187… − 3000
= $646.52 (to the nearest cent).
Find the total amount when $5000 is invested for 3 years at 4% per annum, compounded
quarterly.
Answer
Quarterly: r = 4 ÷ 4 = 1 and
n = 3 × 4 = 12. A = 5000(1 + 1/100)12 = 5000 × 1.0112
= $5634.13 (to the nearest cent).
$1200 is invested at 3% per annum compounded yearly. Show that the interest earned in the
second year is larger than in the first.
Answer
Year 1: interest = 3% of $1200 = $36, so
A1 = $1236.
Year 2: interest = 3% of $1236 = $37.08.
$37.08 > $36 because the second year's 3% is charged on the larger principal $1236
— the first year's interest is itself now earning interest.
Rahim deposited $2000 in an account paying compound interest yearly. After 3 years he had
$2249.73. Find the interest rate.
Answer
(1 + r/100)3
= 2249.73 ÷ 2000 = 1.124865
1 + r/100 =
= 1.04 r/100 = 0.04, so r = 4 — the rate is 4% per
annum.
One bank offers 4% per annum compounded yearly; another offers 4% per annum compounded
monthly. Without calculating, say which pays more, and why.
Answer
The monthly one. Both quote the same 4% a year,
but the monthly account adds a twelfth of it at the end of every month, so from month 2
onwards the interest is charged on a principal that has already grown — the
interest starts earning interest sooner. The more often interest is compounded, the
larger the total.
Past-paper questions
G3N2024 · Paper 1 · Q163 marks
Alice invested some money into an account paying compound interest at 3.2% per
year.
After 5 years, the money had earned total interest of $2132.16 .
Calculate the amount of money Alice invested in the account.
[3]
Worked solution
Let the amount invested be $P. After 5 years the account holds
The interest is that total minus the money put in, so
P × 1.0325 − P = 2132.16
P(1.0325 − 1) = 2132.16, and
1.0325 = 1.170 572 95…, so
0.170 572 95… P = 2132.16
Alice invested $12 500 (to the nearest cent the division
itself gives $12 499.99).
Check: $12 500 × 0.170 572 95… = $2132.1619…,
which is the printed $2132.16 to the cent.
Why this works. Everything hinges on the word
interest: $2132.16 is what the money earned, so the equation is
total − principal = interest. Taking P out as a common factor,
P(1.0325 − 1), is the credited line, and the bracket is
the 5-year interest per dollar invested, about 17.06 cents. Keep 1.0325
unrounded — rounding it to 1.17 gives $12 542.
The whole chapter in one table
If you can reproduce this table from memory, you have the skeleton of the topic. Everything
else hangs off it.
What it says
Use it when
The classic slip
Law 1
two powers of the same base are multiplied
using it when the bases differ
Law 2
two powers of the same base are divided
subtracting the wrong way round
Law 3
a power is raised to another power
adding the indices instead of multiplying
Law 4
a bracketed product is raised to a power
leaving the coefficient unraised
Law 5
a bracketed fraction is raised to a power
raising the numerator only
Compound interest
interest is added to the principal each period (the one formula here that is printed on the paper)
using the annual rate when it compounds half-yearly or monthly; giving A when the interest A − P was asked for
Zero index
, a ≠ 0
any base at all carries the index 0
reading 2x0 as (2x)0
Negative index
, a ≠ 0
an index is negative, or "positive index form" is asked for
making the answer negative instead of a reciprocal
Rational index
, a ≥ 0
an index is a fraction
swapping the root and the power
Unknown index
if then x = n
the unknown sits in the index
trying to take a root instead of matching the bases
Standard form
, 1 ≤ A < 10, n an integer
a number is very large or very small
leaving A outside the range 1 to 10
× and ÷
multiply or divide the As; add or subtract the indices
the powers of ten may differ freely
forgetting the final re-tidy of A
+ and −
make the powers of ten equal, then add or subtract the As
the two terms are added or subtracted
adding the As while the powers still differ
The formulae to know by heart
The five Laws of Indices. Bases a, b real and indices
m, nrational; Laws 1–3 then need a > 0, and
Laws 4–5 need a > 0 and b > 0.
The three definitions. The first two need a ≠ 0; the third needs
a ≥ 0 with n a positive integer.
In general
— bottom is the root, top is the power.
Standard form.
where 1 ≤ A < 10 and n is an integer.
Reading the index. Large numbers give a positive index, numbers between 0 and 1 give a
negative one, and the index counts the places the decimal point has moved.
× and ÷. Deal with the A-numbers and the powers of ten
separately, using Laws 1 and 2 on the indices.
+ and −. Rewrite one term so that both carry the same power of ten, then
treat that power as a common factor. Either way, finish by checking
1 ≤ A < 10.
The habits that earn the marks
1. Name the law you used — "Law 1 of Indices" beside the line is a free method
mark. 2. Clear every bracket before combining anything, and give the outside index to
every factor inside, coefficients included. 3. Indices work is exact: leave fractions as fractions and never round an exact
answer. 4. "Positive index form" means no negative index survives into the answer. 5. In standard form, check 1 ≤ A < 10 on the last line, every
time. 6. Round once, at the end, to 3 s.f. unless the question names another accuracy
— and count the figures on A only. 7. Answer in the units the question asked for, and check the magnitude is plausible.
Syllabus at a glance
The three G3 Mathematics (K310) outcomes this chapter covers, quoted from the
Secondary Three/Four section of the syllabus — and the Problems in Real-World
Contexts entry that admits compound interest.
G3 Mathematics (K310, first examination 2027) — these notes
are written to it.
problems in real-world contexts — "in personal and household finance,
including simple and compound interest, taxation, instalments, utilities
bills, money exchange, etc."
Wording is quoted verbatim from the Secondary Three/Four section
of the G3 Mathematics syllabus. Two notes on scope. Surds are not in this syllabus
— the word appears nowhere in K310 or in the by-level document, so the radical sign
is used here only to say what a rational index means, never as something to be
simplified or rationalised; that is Additional Mathematics. And compound interest,
which the textbook develops in 3A §3.5 as an application of indices, is examinable even
though it is not one of the numbered N1 outcomes: the syllabus admits it under
Problems in Real-World Contexts, which may be "In personal and household
finance, including simple and compound interest, taxation, instalments, utilities bills,
money exchange, etc." That section appears in the G3 and G2 documents in identical
wording, and the formula itself is the first entry on the paper's own formulae list. It
is covered in full in 1.4. The G2 Mathematics syllabus
lists 1.8, 1.9 and 1.10 in word-for-word identical wording, so — unusually
— every part of this chapter is examinable in both bands and nothing here is marked
as G3-only.
Chermistry · Indices & Standard Form revision notes · ZJ CHER, 2026
Ask CherAI
Cher’s AI study helper
Your question allowance
…
Every question goes to an AI service that charges Cher for each answer, so there is a cap
that keeps CherAI free for everyone:
80 questions a day
Premium accounts have no limit
The site has its own ceiling, so one busy hour cannot lock everybody out
The hourly count resets on the hour. Long answers cost no more than short ones —
ask one good question rather than five quick ones.
Answers are written by an AI, so check them against the notes. Pictures are read by Claude, an AI. Please don’t type personal details or include them in pictures.