📐 Indices & Standard Form — Revision Notes

Light travels 9 460 730 472 580 800 metres in a year; a hydrogen atom's radius is about 0.000 000 000 053 m. An index writes repeated multiplication once, the five Laws of Indices combine those short forms, and standard form does the same for base 10. Syllabus outcomes N1 1.8, 1.9 and 1.10, plus compound interest.

The four questions this chapter answers

Formula sheet: compound interest only Exact answers here

The questionWhere it is answeredThe tool
How do I combine powers without writing out all the factors? 1.1 Laws of Indices the five laws — add, subtract or multiply the indices
What can an index be, if not a positive whole number? 1.2 Zero, Negative & Rational Indices the three definitions — and the laws still hold
How do I write down, and calculate with, an enormous or a tiny number? 1.3 Standard Form A × 10n, with 1 ≤ A < 10
What happens to money left in a bank, when the interest earns interest too? 1.4 Compound Interest A=P(1+r100)n — an index counting the periods
More detail

The paper's own formulae page holds mensuration, trigonometry and statistics, and — as its very first entry — the compound interest formula used in 1.4. The five Laws of Indices, the three definitions and the meaning of standard form are not printed there, so they are carried in your head.

Indices work is nearly all exact, so most answers in 1.1 and 1.2 are left as whole numbers, fractions or powers with nothing rounded. Standard-form calculations that do not come out exact are the exception: give those to 3 s.f. unless the question names a different accuracy, rounding once, on the last line.

Index notation — the recap ⓘ Recap

Everything in this chapter rests on one piece of shorthand you already have.

The index notation of a×a××a (n factors), where a is a real number and n is a positive integer, is an. The number a is the base and n is the index (plural: indices).
5 4 base index (or power) = 5 × 5 × 5 × 5 4 factors
Fig. 1.1
54 is read "5 to the power of 4". The base says what is being multiplied; the index says how many factors there are. Numbers with a base of 5, such as 51, 52 and 53, are called powers of 5.
An index is not a multiplier. 210 is 1024, not 20 — and that gap is what makes the notation worth having.
Where this comes from

The textbook opens the chapter with a donation that doubles every day. Thirty doublings of a single cent is 230 cents — 1 073 741 824 cents, about $10.7 million. Thirty times a cent would have been 30 cents, which is the same gap between 210 and 20, drawn out far enough to see.

The five Laws of Indices

Each law is counting factors, written in shorthand. Here are all five, with the condition each one needs.

In symbolsIn wordsWhat must match
Law 1 am×an=am+n multiplying → add the indices the two bases
Law 2 am÷an=amn, or aman=amn dividing → subtract the indices the two bases
Law 3 (am)n=amn a power of a power → multiply the indices
Law 4 an×bn=(a×b)n multiplying → multiply the bases, index unchanged the two indices
Law 5 an÷bn=(ab)n dividing → divide the bases, index unchanged the two indices
The conditions, exactly as the textbook states them. In Laws 1–5 the indices m and n are positive integers. In Law 2 the base a is a real number with a ≠ 0 and m > n; in Law 5 the bases are real with b ≠ 0. Laws 1, 3 and 4 hold for any real bases. Section 1.2 lifts all five laws to zero, negative and rational indices — and tightens the conditions on the bases when it does.

Walkthrough 1 — Law 1 with coefficients Basic

Simplify 8m5n3 × 3m2n4, leaving your answer in index notation.
  1. 8m5n3 × 3m2n4 = 8 × 3 × m5 × m2 × n3 × n4
    Multiplication is commutative, so the factors may be reordered freely. Gathering the numbers together and each letter with its own kind puts every pair of matching bases side by side — the one condition Law 1 needs.
  2. = 24m5 + 2n3 + 4    (Law 1 of Indices)
    8 × 3 = 24 is ordinary multiplication: the 24 is a coefficient, not a base, so it never collects an index. For the letters, Law 1 adds the indices because the bases match.
  3. = 24m7n7
    5 + 2 = 7 and 3 + 4 = 7. "In index notation" means this is the answer — writing the seven factors of m back out would be undoing the whole point of the notation.

Walkthrough 2 — Law 2 with coefficients Basic

Simplify 15p6q5 ÷ 5p4q2, leaving your answer in index notation.
  1. 15p6q5 ÷ 5p4q2 = 15p6q55p4q2
    Written inline, "÷ 5p4q2" is easy to read as dividing by the 5 only. As a single fraction, every factor of the divisor is visibly underneath, which is what the next step depends on.
  2. = 155 × p6p4 × q5q2
    Split the one fraction into three, each holding a single base. A fraction may be split like this because multiplication and division travel together — and now each piece is exactly the shape Law 2 describes.
  3. = 3 × p6 − 4 × q5 − 2    (Law 2 of Indices)
    15 ÷ 5 = 3 for the coefficients. For each letter, Law 2 subtracts the index below from the index above — in that order, because subtraction is not symmetrical.
  4. = 3p2q3
    6 − 4 = 2 and 5 − 2 = 3. The answer is exact and in index notation, so nothing further is wanted.

Walkthrough 3 — Laws 1 to 3, with a letter in the index Intermediate

Simplify (6k)4 × (63)k ÷ (62)k, leaving your answer in index notation.
  1. (6k)4 × (63)k ÷ (62)k = 6k × 4 × 63 × k ÷ 62 × k    (Law 3 of Indices)
    Law 3 clears every bracket by multiplying the two indices. Doing this first is what turns three differently-shaped terms into three plain powers of the same base, 6.
  2. = 64k × 63k ÷ 62k
    Tidy each index. A letter in an index behaves like a letter anywhere else: 4 × k is written 4k, and it is still a single index.
  3. = 64k + 3k − 2k    (Laws 1 & 2 of Indices)
    Law 1 adds the indices of the two factors being multiplied and Law 2 subtracts the index of the divisor. The base 6 is written once and never changes — only the index is doing any work.
  4. = 65k
    4k + 3k − 2k = 5k, collecting like terms in the index. Index notation is the only possible answer here: with k unknown, there is no number to evaluate.

Walkthrough 4 — Laws 1 to 4 on a fraction Intermediate

Simplify (ab3)2×(−2a3b)3(2a2b2)2, leaving your answer in index notation.
  1. (ab3)2 = a2(b3)2,   (−2a3b)3 = (−2)3(a3)3b3,   (2a2b2)2 = 22(a2)2(b2)2   (Law 4)
    Law 4 hands the outside index to every factor inside the bracket — the number in front included, so the −2 and the 2 are raised as well.
  2. = a2b6×(−8)a9b34a4b4   (Law 3)
    Law 3 multiplies the indices of a power of a power: (b3)2 = b6. The numbers are ordinary arithmetic, and an odd index keeps a minus sign: (−2)3 = −8.
  3. = −8a11b94a4b4   (Law 1)
    The numerator is now a product of matching bases, so Law 1 adds: 2 + 9 = 11 and 6 + 3 = 9. The minus sign travels with the coefficient, never with an index.
  4. = −84 × a11 − 4 × b9 − 4   (Law 2)
    Divide the coefficients as ordinary numbers and subtract the indices base by base — top index minus bottom index.
  5. = −2a7b5
    −8 ÷ 4 = −2, 11 − 4 = 7 and 9 − 4 = 5. The sign is written once, in front, and the answer is left in index notation.

Walkthrough 5 — all five laws together Advanced

Simplify (−2m3n2)5÷8m7mn14, leaving your answer in index notation.
  1. (−2m3n2)5=(−2m3)5(n2)5
    Law 5, read as (ab)n=anbn: an index outside a fraction goes to the top and the bottom, not to one of them.
  2. = −32m15n10   (Laws 4 & 3)
    Law 4 spreads the index 5 over both factors of the numerator and Law 3 multiplies the indices: (−2)5 = −32 (odd index, sign kept), (m3)5 = m15 and (n2)5 = n10.
  3. = −32m15n10×mn148m7
    Dividing by a fraction is multiplying by its reciprocal — the second fraction is turned upside down. Doing this before any index work means every factor ends up unambiguously on the top or on the bottom of one product.
  4. = −32m16n148m7n10   (Law 1)
    Multiply the two numerators and the two denominators, then use Law 1 on the top: m15 × m = m15 + 1 = m16. A letter written with no index has an index of 1.
  5. = −4m9n4
    −32 ÷ 8 = −4, and Law 2 subtracts the indices: 16 − 7 = 9 and 14 − 10 = 4. Every index in the answer is a positive integer, so no further tidying is needed.
Where this comes from

Each law is nothing more than counting factors, which is why you can always rebuild one you have forgotten. Written out, 72 × 74 is (7 × 7) × (7 × 7 × 7 × 7): two factors then four factors, so six factors altogether — and 2 + 4 = 6. That is Law 1.

Laws 4 and 5 are the two that read backwards as often as forwards, so learn both directions: (ab)n=anbn and (ab)n=anbn. Read left to right they are how a bracket is opened; read right to left they are how two separate powers are gathered.

Past-paper questions

G3 N2022 · Paper 1 · Q2(a) 1 mark
  1. Simplify 3y5 × 5y3. [1]
Worked solution

3y5 × 5y3 = (3 × 5) × (y5 × y3) = 15y5 + 3   (Law 1)

= 15y8

Why this works. The mark is for keeping the two halves of the term apart: 3 and 5 multiply as ordinary numbers, while Law 1 takes the matching letters and adds 5 + 3 = 8. Multiplying the indices instead gives 15y15. Writing the y5 + 3 line names the law you used.

The four errors this topic is built to catch

Each of these four is a law used without its condition. Read the right-hand column and the condition is always the thing that was missing.

WrongRightWhat went wrong
23 × 54 = 107 23 × 53 = 103, but 23 × 54 will not combine at all Law 1 needs the same base; Law 4 needs the same index. With neither matching, there is no law to use.
(x2)3 = x5 (x2)3 = x6 Adding the indices is Law 1 (a product of two powers). A power of a power is Law 3, and it multiplies.
(2x2)3 = 2x6 (2x2)3 = 8x6 Law 4 gives the index to every factor inside the bracket. The coefficient is a factor, so it is cubed too.
(a + b)2 = a2 + b2 (a + b)2 = a2 + 2ab + b2 There is no law of indices for a sum. Test it: (3 + 4)2 = 49, but 32 + 42 = 25.
Brackets decide what the base is. In 2x4 only the x is raised: 2 × x4. In (2x)4 the whole of 2x is the base: 16x4.
An even index removes a minus sign; an odd index keeps it. (−2)4 = 16, the same as 24, but (−2)5 = −32.
More detail

The same reading of brackets settles −32 against (−3)2: in −32 only the 3 is squared, so it is −9, while (−3)2 squares the whole of −3 and gives 9.

Because an even index removes the sign, an answer can often be written two ways and both are right: (−2)4 and 24 are both 16, so either may be left as the answer. An odd index is different — (−2)5 = −32 is not 25.

Check yourself

  • Simplify 5a4b7 × 4a3b2.
    Answer

    = 5 × 4 × a4 × a3 × b7 × b2
    = 20a4 + 3b7 + 2
    = 20a7b9 (Law 1).

  • Simplify (−12x7y5) ÷ (3xy2).
    Answer

    = −12x7y53xy2 = −4 × x7 − 1 × y5 − 2
    = −4x6y3 (Law 2). Remember x counts as x1.

  • Simplify (2c3d4)5.
    Answer

    = 25(c3)5(d4)5 (Law 4)
    = 32c15d20 (Law 3)
    = 32c15d20. The coefficient 2 is raised to the fifth power as well: 25 = 32, not 2.

  • Simplify (3h2k)3×(−2hk4)2(6h3k2)2.
    Answer

    Numerator: (3h2k)3 = 27h6k3 and (−2hk4)2 = 4h2k8, so the numerator is 108h8k11.
    Denominator: (6h3k2)2 = 36h6k4.
    108 ÷ 36 = 3, 8 − 6 = 2, 11 − 4 = 7, so = 3h2k7. Note (−2)2 = +4: an even index removes the minus sign.

  • Given that y9 × (y2)n ÷ (y3)2 = y17, find the value of n.
    Answer

    y9 × y2n ÷ y6 = y9 + 2n − 6 = y3 + 2n
    Same base, so the indices are equal: 3 + 2n = 17
    2n = 14, n = 7.

  • Explain why a4 × b4 can be written as (ab)4, but a4 × b3 cannot be written as (ab)4 or as (ab)7.
    Answer

    Law 4 combines two powers with the same index by multiplying the bases, and 4 = 4, so a4 × b4 = (ab)4. Law 1 combines two powers with the same base by adding the indices, and here the bases differ. In a4 × b3 neither the bases nor the indices match, so no law applies and the expression is already in its simplest form. Check with numbers: 24 × 33 = 432, while 64 = 1296 and 67 = 279 936.